CreamyWeenie@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agoRule of holdinglemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up172arrow-down10
arrow-up172arrow-down1imageRule of holdinglemmy.blahaj.zoneCreamyWeenie@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squareLolaCat@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoHow about a bag of holding with many kobolds?
minus-squaredejf@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoPerhaps a bag of holding with many kobolds with many pockets? Which contain more bags with more kobolds with more pockets—
minus-squareDarkenLM@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoThat has enough “Shulker Box inside Shulker Box” energy to make the universe implode.
minus-squareYakTrimmer@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoLabelled as “Oops! All Tucker’s kobolds!”
minus-squareCreamyWeenie@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoTruly the best of both worlds.
How about a bag of holding with many kobolds?
Perhaps a bag of holding with many kobolds with many pockets? Which contain more bags with more kobolds with more pockets—
That has enough “Shulker Box inside Shulker Box” energy to make the universe implode.
Labelled as “Oops! All Tucker’s kobolds!”
Truly the best of both worlds.