• Star@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    they don’t “plant trees” but rather contribute very little amounts to existing programmes

    Ofcourse they don’t plant trees themselves, it’s a search engine with a small team. They donate their entire profit which averages upwards of a million euros every month, to local tree planting initiatives across the world and that isn’t a ‘little’ number at all.

    “Every search plants a tree” is a lie. It’s not every search, but rather every couple clicks on an ad

    I agree, they were ‘a bit’ misleading with that in the past. Although they did state in their tree counter earlier and somewhere in their website/blog that it was roughly 45 searches (in Germany, depends on region) which raised enough money to plant a tree. They’ve since removed most, if not all of the misinformation.

    They use Bing results making them useless

    Since when does using Bing results make a search engine a ‘scam’? DuckDuckGo also uses Bing results, would you call that a scam as well? Ecosia uses Bing search results because it’s close to impossible to make an independent search engine which gives satisfactory results without the resources of a tech giant.

    • meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      to local tree planting initiatives across the world

      Pick a lane. It can’t be both. Either they donate to local initiatives or global ones. Pick one.

      Also Ecosia is a not for profit company. They don’t hide that fact.

      • ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think local initiatives around the world would mean initiatives around the world which are specifically local, rather than large, multinational planting organisations.