Many “alternative” search engines are better for privacy, but they are still vulnerable to censorship, because they rely on g**gle and m*crosoft’s indices for their search results. This isn’t a deep-hidden secret either, many of them disclose what search index they use on the “about” page, for example:

There are still search engines that (claim to) maintain their own index. Most surprisingly, br*ve:

  • balderdash@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I like the idea, but I can’t justify $10 a month. Downvote me or whatever, but I’m broke and need to cut as many subscriptions as possible.

    • li10@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s fair.

      You could argue that it’s worth the money to get better results and avoid Google, but with so many companies trying to take $10 a month you have to draw the line somewhere.

    • the_weez
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      10 months ago

      No, I’m with you. $120 a year is too steep for searching for me. I like what they are trying to do but I don’t think the average person will spend that much.

      • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        People spend thousands of dollars a year on coffee which they use less frequently. If you can afford it it absolutely is worth it.

        • the_weez
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I absolutely do not spend more than $999.99 a year on coffee and I drink it every day. I’m sure some people do.

          Both of those things are outside of my budget.

          • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I don’t know how many qualifiers I need in order to avoid responses like this but I feel like it was pretty clear.

            I get a good deal doesn’t make something affordable. The point of my comment is that plenty of people - not necessarily you - can afford to pay for it and it is well worth it at $120/yr.

        • Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          I think we got spoiled with Google which is their goal. Undercut competitions then when there’s no competition then enshitificate.

    • Norgur@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Why downvote? That’s a fair point. There is a free tier with a few free searches per year (2000 or something). You could sign up and use this budget whenever your search engine of choice fails you.

    • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Yea, I just think I either pay for something like Kagi, or I am subject to something like Google. I’m not sure there is a third way that pays for the servers and talent needed to deliver search results, but my imagination might just be limited.