From the Outlook Android app

  • gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    WE VALUE YOUR PRIVACY!*

    *no we don’t. not even a little.

    • _danny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      8 months ago

      No, I think they’re being literal. There is value that they want in your privacy.

    • h3ndrik@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago
      • We value your privacy (in a twisted way)
      • Our company’s value (increases with access to) your privacy

      Or the idea of the title and text was to create a paradox like: The following statement is true. // The preceding statement is false.

  • muelltonne@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    8 months ago

    There will be some lawsuit in the future somewhere in Europe. And the judge will rightfully rule that you can’t get an “informed consent” from your users for 800 tracking companies just by letting them click a button with dark patterns.

    • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Europe for sure. USA? Better chance of the president smoking rock at the state of the union. Land of the fee and all that.

  • toastal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Anything ran by Microsoft is a privacy concern (includes Windows, Teams, npm, GitHub)

  • h3ndrik@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    At least they are (forced to be) honest ¯_(ツ)_/¯

    I like the rest of the wording, too. They’d like to process arbitrary data from the device. And third parties act out of their own motivation as long as it is their legitimate interest…

    Use ‘REJECT ALL’.

    • YoorWeb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      REJECT ALL button doesn’t often work as you’d expect. Websites/Apps can (and do) still approve so called “legitimate interest” option. The only way to be sure is to click “manage preferences” and dig in to check if legitimate interest is enabled. Sometimes you’ll see “object all” in there, but you will find notice that some websites require to manually disable legitimate interest for each of the hundreds of partners manually.

      • N0x0n@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        Hehe, keep up spreading that important info 💪✌️. Most people aren’t aware and this practice should be illegal. Reject ALL… Every word they say is just a fucking lie.

      • h3ndrik@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I guess ‘Reject All’ means just ‘reject all of the above’, and there are are additional terms that are binding, they just spared you from handling those with this popup, or why is that kind of thing legal?

  • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    What’s worse is when it’s accept all or manage preferences, and you manually have to turn off cookies for all 718 partners individually, every time you open the app.

      • stratosfear@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        [title] is technically [alt text] for readers and vision impaired, so the title should be more of a description of the image.