L4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoHumiliated lawyers fined $5,000 for submitting ChatGPT hallucinations in court: ‘I heard about this new site, which I falsely assumed was, like, a super search engine’fortune.comexternal-linkmessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up148arrow-down11file-textcross-posted to: technology@chat.maiion.com
arrow-up147arrow-down1external-linkHumiliated lawyers fined $5,000 for submitting ChatGPT hallucinations in court: ‘I heard about this new site, which I falsely assumed was, like, a super search engine’fortune.comL4sBot@lemmy.worldMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square19fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@chat.maiion.com
minus-squareThe Snark Urge@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoIt should be several thousand per false citation, and disbarment for any repeat offense.
minus-squareRooki@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoBut for example in a case where the other party could get in jail for his false citation? I would not be accepting yeah you could have gone to jail for this fake citations but he gets just pat on his hands with some cash money.
It should be several thousand per false citation, and disbarment for any repeat offense.
But for example in a case where the other party could get in jail for his false citation? I would not be accepting yeah you could have gone to jail for this fake citations but he gets just pat on his hands with some cash money.