What made you prefer Godot over other engines like Unity or Unreal Engine?

  • Julian@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The way it’s designed is just nice - in unity if you’re trying to do something the engine doesn’t do by default, it feels like you’re almost fighting it. But in Godot a lot of the engine’s built in features are just things you can add yourself - resources, nodes, and editor plugins.

    Also, support for serializing/deserializing dictionaries. When I used unity a few years ago it didn’t have that feature and afaik it still doesn’t.

    • Bowen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This was the biggest thing for me. I’m not really on the up and up with game design in editors like unity and unreal so it’s a lot of work just to get the basics going. In godot? It’s very easy and almost never changes between versions. I’ve been able to use 4 year old tutorials and still follow along.

      In Unity if you’re not paying for courses on that version of unity you’re likely lost as shit as they’ll rename things or move them around between major versions. It’s a lot of lost time trying to figure out where it’s been moved to, and it’s also very demoralizing and makes me give up quickly.

  • nibblebit@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s just transparent. It feels like alot of lessons were learned from the broken abstractions of older ecs engines. It might not be as powerful yet, but the foundation is solid and it’s easy to implement the more complicated stuff.

    Also, dotnet 6 implementation is a breath of fresh air.

  • anteaters@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really like how you just start it and you have all you need. Script editor is there and exporting can also easily be done. No bullshit in your way to get going.

  • Kotzwinkle@crystals.rest
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Small, lightweight, open source, a large active community, and honestly even gdscript has started to grow on me

    • F4stL4ne@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pretty much all this, plus:

      • it’s very well made for learning to dev,
      • Unity is garbage,
      • UE is soooo big.

      The thing Godot is lacking is a real good way to work on adaptative music and sound design.

  • Klaymore@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nicer UI, I don’t have to faff about with Unity Hub or whatever, and it feels a lot simpler and cleaner.

  • DeadlyEssence01@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, Unity had a lot of unfinished packages that they suggest you use, and then depreciated the packages that they had already, and it seemed like a huge mess. Unity also took forever to load, - so I prefer the ‘just works’ of Godot features, and the fact that it’s lightweight and quick to load.

  • learningduck@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Easier to understand UI compared to Unity. Most of the resources taught the same way or at least a more optimal way.

    If I look up how to do things in Unity, I tend to find sub optimal answers most of the time. Like suggesting to do things in the frame render loop.

  • AdmiralShat@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago
    1. Unity has a plethora of half baked features and they routinely deprecate features.
    2. Having multiple render pipelines was very frustrating when trying to learn the more complex visual stuff.
    3. the Node and scenes system makes way more sense to me. In Unity you have scriptable objects and prefabs, both of which are half as valuable as everything being a scene. Being able yo isolate individual components and work on them in their own tab and test them out by running an individual scene is significantly faster development pace, as well as more streamlined.
    4. Easier Access to multiple programming languages. C# is like 95% up to par with GDScript as far as engine integration. With 4 its a first class language as far as development.
  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s lightweight (~350mb after decompression, I’m not fooled by the small executable), fast startup, generates relatively small executables, compiles to several platforms

    I’m not learned enough in Unity or UE to make proper equivalent benchmarks to see who makes faster 2D or 3D stuff

    GDScript being pretty much syntathically identical to Python makes it simple to learn and understand, which I enjoy. I’ve yet to learn how to use nodes, which I suppose won’t be too different from Blender’s? Don’t know how to mess with those either