The story of the SSH port is 22.
www.ssh.com
The SSH port is 22. This is the story of how it got that port number. And practical configuration instructions.
  • poweruser@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
    31·
    9 months ago

    The -p <port> option can be used to specify the port number to connect to when using the ssh command on Linux. The -P <port> (note: capital P) option can be used with SFTP and scp.

    Why is it that the switch on ssh is -p but in scp/sftp it is -P?

    This has caused me a real headache in the past as ssh doesn’t throw an error message when you use a switch like “ssh -P 8080”

    • palordrolap@kbin.social
      12·
      9 months ago

      At a guess, it’s because the function of preserving file dates and times is more likely than setting the port to something other than the default, so it gets the lowercase character, whereas ssh doesn’t do anything with files so the port option gets the lowercase character.

      The inconsistency is annoying though. I wonder if they could make ssh’s -p option case insensitive so -P works across the board. (Maybe -P is reserved for some unknown future purpose?)

      A work-around would be introducing long options and having --port be the option’s long name across all the commands, but then, that comes with its own problems.

    • Perhyte@lemmy.worldEnglish
      7·
      9 months ago

      If this is something you run into often, it’s likely still only for a limited number of servers? ssh and scp both respect .ssh/config, and I suspect (but haven’t tested) that sftp does too. If you add something like this to that file:

      Host host1 host2
  Port 8080

      then SSH connections to hosts named in that first line will use port 8080 by default and you can leave off the -p/-P when contacting those hosts. You can add multiple such sections if you have other hosts that require different ports, of course.

    • perishthethought@lemm.eeEnglish
      16·
      9 months ago

      Me too. My biggest takeaway though was that ‘SSH’ is a company today, providing network and security services. Interesting!

      • aard@kyu.de
        2·
        9 months ago

        They’re in a lot of government networks world wide (I visited them a long time ago to discuss some potential cooperation) - they’re technically quite sound, and as bonus them being privately owned and headquartered in small Finland is generally seen as reducing the likelihood of backdoors or similar issues due to conflicting state interests.

  • kahdbrixk@feddit.de
    25·
    9 months ago

    The title made it sound a little more interesting then it actually was, but sometimes stories of great impact are very short and unexeptional