• mrcranky@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    The article is full of racist dog whistles and conspiracies, as well as fallacies about the economic reality and the comments are 10x worse.

    • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Man you weren’t kidding.

      To start with, there would be yet another blue-ribbon advisory panel made up of ethnically, regionally, occupationally and gender diverse worthies who nevertheless somehow hew to the same monochromatically pink interventionist line.

      These days the growth jobs seem to be among communications people, lobbyists, diversity officers, ethicists, ESG specialists and so on.

      In deference to modern mores, I’d probably suggest changing “he” to “she”

      This guy really doesn’t like women and minorities making decisions.

      • HLB217@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a nat-po article, I’m surprised they didn’t just open with “woman bad - liberals bad” and then devolve from there