• socphoenixOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am struggling to figure out how anyone could be convicted of stalking under this ruling. Some of his texts even involves death threats!

    • GuyDudeman@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would say that he did demonstrate that he was insane, and therefore should be confined to a mental health institution.

      • Nepenthe@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        But that’s the thing. Are they going to…put him in a mental institution? Because he desperately needs to be in a good one. I would be much more ok with this ruling if he were. I’m getting the sense he’s going back to society where he will behave totally normally from now on.

        • dismalnow@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s not THE thing. That’s A thing that is related, sad, and irrelevant to how the Supreme Court operates.

          Fwiw, Colorado is making great sides in redirecting mentally ill from law enforcement toward social services. Tons of room for improvement, but they’re wholly separate things, systemically.

    • dismalnow@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can demonstrate intent without an admission, and it doesn’t require intent to get a conviction for harassment. Stalking is different.