• AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      So we need to know both the range and the false positive rate, as well as the response

      • are they deployed so the only places in range of detection are non-white areas?
      • is there a high rate of false positives that somehow is worse in non-white areas?
      • is the response different in non-white areas vs white areas?
      • does the response specifically target non-white people in the target area?
      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’d imagine there’s a higher prevalence of gunshots in the non-white areas so more mics are placed there.

    • FireTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Part of the problem is that there’s other loud noises that sound like gunshots like a car backfiring.

        • FireTower@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          There may be a typical distinctive range but it isn’t a range unique to firearms. There’s also real world variables at play here such as gunshots outdoors vs indoors that’d force them to broaden that range leading to more false positives.

            • TheOtherThyme@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Way too many variables. Are you shooting 9mm, 45, .338 Lapua, .22lr? Are you shooting from a 9 in barrel, a 16 in, a three inch? Are you using a muffler? What brand and type? What is your range to the gun shot? Is the bullet supersonic or subsonic? Does the roofers hammer make a sound that falls inside the wide range of noises? There is no way to make an accurate profile for gun shot noise.