Survey of 154 scholars places 45th president behind even ‘historically calamitous chief executives’ linked to civil war

Donald Trump finished 45th and rock bottom of a list ranking US presidents by greatness, trailing even “historically calamitous chief executives” who failed to stop the civil war or botched its aftermath.

Worse for the likely Republican nominee this year, his probable opponent, Joe Biden, debuted at No 14.

“Biden’s most important achievements may be that he rescued the presidency from Trump, resumed a more traditional style of presidential leadership and is gearing up to keep the office out of his predecessor’s hands this fall,” Justin Vaughn and Brandon Rottinghaus, the political scientists behind the survey, wrote in the Los Angeles Times.

  • frezik
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Because for once, America is helping against an imperialist aggressor rather than encouraging it. It also happens to be in our best interest to show to other dictators how bad an idea it is.

      • frezik
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        OK. Now we get directly involved and Russia goes nuclear, or we don’t get involved at all and Russia takes over Ukraine.

          • frezik
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            You offering something better? Because I’m not seeing it.

            • FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              FIght your own fight. This war by proxy shit is bunk. If he’s bad enough to stop, then let’s go fucking stop him. If he’s not then why waste our money and their lives? It could be over tomorrow if we really wanted it to be, but we’ll just string it along, drag it out. Fuel the war machine.

              • frezik
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Because they’d go nuclear. We covered this.

                • FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  you don’t know that. and by being the first country to “go nuclear” they’d be putting a HUGE target on their backs. no way that would happen.

                  • frezik
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Ok, it makes things more likely to go nuclear. Now that’s that settled, this is a bad idea, right?