• 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thats why they get the good stuff. Gotta keep the leaders honest with a few riots and manure deliveries to their homes.

    • 🌊 🍸 🎹@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d use a past tense here. Recent (20y) riots have not stopped the recent governments from trying to kill the french supportive state.

          • shifty51@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            From 62 to 64, and they rioted. For comparison Canada retirement age is 65 and many is states is 67. Your statement implies that the French retirement age is an outlier and it’s really not.

            • CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Macro saved France with that, he can’t run again anyway so he will now push policys that are “against the public opinion” but necessary.

              • matlag@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                There’s an army of institutions and economists who reviewed the issue over and over with 1 conclusion: there were many different solutions, raising the retirement age was ONE of them. So this was not necessary. This was a choice.

                The system is a “simple” in/out equation. Twice in the past years this government has reduced the money in. Now they tell everyone they “saved” the system and there was no other solution. That’s all BS.

                And by the way: looks like they couldn’t even do their math properly, because the system will still run a deficit by 2030. They counted some revenue twice. So much for “the experts”…

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you’re talking about the recent policy, the protests did not fix that. The president ignored public opinion, the labor unions, and then ignored Parliament, who voted against the measure, and forced it through. It’ll be interesting to see if that ends up permanent. If macron lasts longer than the new retirement age.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Actually:

            June 4th, 2023, 300 Germans set fire to police barricades and attacked Leipzig police officers. The rioters were protesting jail sentences for people who attacked neo-nazis.

            Source:

            https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/06/04/europe/leipzig-germany-lina-e-far-left-protest-intl/index.html

            These are protests to breaches by authority against standing political, social and economic infrastructure rather than the infrastructure itself you are referring to; that infrastructure is as in place in France as it is in Germany.

              • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                You said “We have the same stuff in Germany without burning shit down…”

                The article I replied with references Germans “burning shit down” this month to effect change.

                • CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Me not even having known it should already tell you that its absolutely irrelevant…

                  But yes it does happen, but way less than in france, its basically a joke in france nowadays and fucks them up economically.

                  • Djeece@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Ah yes, “The Economy”, the favorite catch all of politicians.

                    I don’t know about you, but from here it looks like it’s going to go to shit whether we burn stuff or not.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            “Astronomically”.

            This is like making fun of a fireman using a bucket of water that’s twice as large as your bucket to put out a house fire.

            They pay twice as much in taxes. Vs the ludicrous cost of most basic citizen necessities in the United States .

            Pay twice as much in taxes, you get affordable/basically free healthcare and adorable/basically free higher education(medical school is 2k a year in France). Affordable, reliable long-distance transportation/physical transportation infrastructure, a living and functional social security, but sure. Careful of those taxes you could pay that would cover all basic human necessities plus all major financial concerns until you croak.

            As an example, instead of paying $3,000 in taxes per year, you could pay $6,000 in taxes per year, and you would be free to pursue any education you liked, including medical school, for $1000-$2000 per year instead of paying 30k per year just to learn core classes. Good thing you saved that 3k during tax season.

              • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You don’t want health care, social security or education?

                You think that right now your taxes are only paying for things you want?

                You’d rather pay $33000 for an emergency appendectomy you had no preparation for than $4000?

                • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  14
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You don’t want health care, social security or education?

                  Not to the extent that I would be paying in taxes under a socialized system, no.

                  You think that right now your taxes are only paying for things you want?

                  Lack of perfection is not an excuse for not pursuing improvement.

              • SimplyKnorax@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sounds a lot like “it’s not my problem until it actually affects me personally”.

                I don’t know why people want to avoid paying as little taxes as possible when it basically improves the infrastructures/services in their own communities.

                • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Sounds a lot like “it’s not my problem until it actually affects me personally”.

                  That is, fundamentally, the definition of “my problem”. If I’m not effected, it isn’t my problem, simply by nature of not effecting me. Not exactly sure what point you’re trying to make with it.

                  I don’t know why people want to avoid paying as little taxes as possible when it basically improves the infrastructures/services in their own communities

                  Because I have little interest in community services and infrastructure.

                  • epicsninja@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    My man here has decided community services like The Fire Department and infrastructure like The Roads are not important to him.

                  • Djeece@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I mean, when you consider the US government spends more (almost twice as much) on healthcare per capita than most countries with free healthcare, you’re literally paying more taxes for it AND you have to shell out 50k$ when something bad happens.

                    Your only argument is “Taxes bad” even when we’re talking about a system that would actually cost less taxes, just because it has a side effect of also helping less fortunate people.

                    How much more egocentric can you get lmao