Jenoki@lemmy.ml to Piracy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 9 months agoThis is the waylemmy.mlimagemessage-square50fedilinkarrow-up1112arrow-down138
arrow-up174arrow-down1imageThis is the waylemmy.mlJenoki@lemmy.ml to Piracy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square50fedilink
minus-squareZeroEcks@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down1·9 months agoSometimes you need to seed back more than 200% because the other two people might not be able to seed it back. I would generally not set a limit
minus-squareRustmilian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down5·edit-29 months agoTrue, but as a minimum you should be doing 200%. Also in a ideal scenario that 200% would be spread out to a lot more people then just 2.
minus-squarelittleblue✨@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down5·9 months agoOP is showing 200% as their maximum. That’s the whole point of this thread. 🤌🏼
minus-squareRustmilian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down3·9 months agoNo shit Sherlock 🫴
minus-squarelittleblue✨@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down5·9 months agoI’m not the one reiterating the salient point of a very short thread. Might do well to read that to yourself instead, friendo. 🤗
minus-squareRustmilian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down6·edit-29 months agoI have no time for children.
Sometimes you need to seed back more than 200% because the other two people might not be able to seed it back. I would generally not set a limit
True, but as a minimum you should be doing 200%.
Also in a ideal scenario that 200% would be spread out to a lot more people then just 2.
OP is showing 200% as their maximum. That’s the whole point of this thread. 🤌🏼
No shit Sherlock 🫴
I’m not the one reiterating the salient point of a very short thread. Might do well to read that to yourself instead, friendo. 🤗
I have no time for children.