(link is to the Supreme Court’s opinion document)

  • JDPoZ@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Let’s re-examine your statement by switching out a couple of words that keep the idea of “why should they get <x>?” to show how it would sound with any other context.


    I <had to lose my eye to a car wreck> - why should we force carmakers to <build vehicles with seatbelts> for what is already the most entitled generation ever?

    They <want to drive> - they can <drive in a car without a seatbelt just like I did>. Otherwise where does it stop? Are they going to <mandate airbags in cars> next?

    Why not? It’s the same principle.


    Do you understand now? If not, try changing what’s in the <x> to being related to “cancer treatment” or “the 40 hour work week” or “social security.”

    Just because something before was bad and we made it better, doesn’t mean we should not do it just because it won’t help everyone.