The federal judiciary’s new rules target “judge shopping.” That’s terrible news for Matthew Kacsmaryk and other partisan judges.

Plaintiffs hoping to reshape federal or state policies will no longer be allowed to choose which judge will hear their case, at least in federal court. A new policy announced Tuesday by the Judicial Conference of the United States, a government body that sets policy for federal courts, targets rules in some federal courts that the conference said “risked creating an appearance of ‘judge shopping.’”

At least in the short term, this policy is a massive victory for the Biden administration — and, indeed, for anyone who believes that federal and state policies should not rise and fall based on one outlier judge’s partisan views.

Texas’s Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton, for example, has been very aggressive in bringing lawsuits that challenge Biden administration policies before right-wing judges who have then issued sweeping, nationwide orders blocking those policies — sometimes on highly dubious grounds that are reversed, months later, by the Supreme Court.

  • Inevitable Waffles [Ohio]A
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    I feel like the media might actually be helping Bidens chances by broadcasting the very obvious bad things Trump plans on doing in office that he has said. Most Dems probably dont give a shit about Gaza so, while we have a problem with it, they dont.

    • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Ehh, I don’t know a soul under 30 who stands w/ Biden and the MIC.

      Trump will be equally as bad, and plenty of Republicans are willing to go 3rd party (as they ALSO hate both Biden and Trump)

      Eventually the dems will see that their refusal to move even a step left is fucking them, until then I blame them for the incoming wave of fascism.