• vvv@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Then what are we even discussing? we’ve had orbital cameras for decades. These are just networked better and launched different?

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is a huge network (hundreds) of very low orbit satellites, making surveillance far closer to realtime, with more global coverage, with presumably a higher resolution. Since there are so many of them they’re also more resistant to anti-satellite weapons than traditional surveillance assets.

      Remember that the existing Keyhole satellites are basically the same build as the Hubble Space Telescope, meaning fewer, larger, more expensive satellites. This is a huge leap in capability.

      • Zron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        And what, you want to be able to use spy satellites to see your neighbor sunbathing in the backyard?

        These are military satellites, to look at military shit like what planes an enemy has on the runway and how many, where tanks are on a battlefield, if a convoy is getting ready to leave a depot and how many vehicles it has. Not to mention, what they are even capable of seeing is a matter of national security. If an enemy knows your satellite only has a certain resolution, they can figure out exactly what camouflage they need to defeat it. If they know how the infrared photography works, they can develop strategies to fake the number of functional vehicles they have. Not everyone in the whole world should know that shit. Otherwise the entire intelligence apparatus of the United States should just pack up and retire.

        We already have a global low latency communication network, it’s the thing I’m sending you this message on now. When we don’t need is a global, high quality, spy satellite network that everyone and their brother can use and learn the capabilities of.

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Exactly my point. YOU don’t need a surveillance network. The US government DOES. And what do you know, this constellation was purchased by the US military, and is entirely for their exclusive use.

          This constellation is being purchased from SpaceX but is not going to be operated by SpaceX. I’m not sure why everyone thinks this is the same as Starlink as if it were a consumer product.

          • db2@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Because Elon is both smart and stupid enough to build in a personal backdoor.

            • Pennomi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Elon barely does anything at SpaceX these days. No doubt this deal is being run by Shotwell instead.