SimulatedKnave

They allow recklessness (so you don’t have to prove intent, you just have to prove that they saw the risk and did it anyway, which I suspect would definitely happen somewhere around the third FB account).

The guy was prosecuted under an objective standard - so basically, if most people think they were threats, they were threats. That’s a very high standard for a criminal conviction.

Kagan makes some extremely reasonable points about how the distinction between hardcore political advocacy and incitement to crime is pretty damn narrow, so you have to insist on at least a recklessness standard. She’s right, and so are the other ones who joined her.

This is definitely a problem that’s going to get worse, fast. Federated communities+feed that draws from a pile of them without particular reference+larger userbase…

Fuck the quality, who thinks a headphone string is a bug not a feature?

You know what’s nice? Having all the bits of your headphones attached to each other. And not relying on a Bluetooth connection.

There is a genetic component to it. A huge chunk of people just…don’t taste what you’re tasting.

At a guess: holdover in style from newspapers, where you needed the space.

Personally, I’m here for the interface. I tried getting into Lemmy. It was unnecessarily arcane, and unnecessarily arcane things usually don’t prosper in these scenarios.

Commenting so I can find this again later.