Typescript is just Javascript with a few extra features sprinkled ontop such as static types instead of Javascripts dynamic, this makes it a lot easier to develop software with. It’s still very much Javascript though, and my comment was a bit of a gaff

I, an intellectual, use typescript.

I unwrap like a mad man while building a proof of concept. It’s the same as approaching say a multithreaded program. You always get the single thread to work first and then worry about adding thread handling later.

Same as result and option handling, that’s for when I want to stabilise my code before finalising for release.

I’m not debating that if it was on purpose it should be more severe, this is about how pathetic F1 penalties are. Don’t straw man my argument.

In this incident we had Stroll fully off the track on the outside after braking too late. He then decided to not break while off-track, re-entered the track unsafely, and careered into Gasly on unsafe re-entry. All of that resulted in a meager 5 second penalty.

I don’t think WEC drivers intend to cause incidents or leave track limits either, it’s a result of driving hard and if you go over those limits, then you get a penalty. This isn’t about intent, this is about the pathetic slap on the wrist for bad driving.

I think there needs to be a rework for the penalties. You look at WEC and a penalty seriously stings. Drive-throughs costing 30 seconds, S&G being 60s. What do we get, 5s for taking a driver out? The penalties are anemic

HAM’s out of DRS, has Norris got it?

I think Sky’s either playing fake crowd sounds or they’re mixing it louder when they want to try and build hype

Where have Sky popped their microphones? Haha

Absolutely manic ending to Q1!

It’s uh the injury from simracing… haha how bizarre

Come on Albon, I think he’s missed his chance, but 1 more hero lap?

I’m 31 and I declare I’m too old to relearn the muscle memory. I acceot the occasional need to retie my laces.

Yeah if we want power at all there’s a heavy carbon cost to it regardless where it comes from. Nuclear from what I understand is more compatible with our preexisting electricity networks because like coal it has big chunks of metal spinning to store energy giving the ability to react incredibly fast to changes in the network. Battery banks may be able to do this quick response, but the longevity of rare earth mineral based solutions although fancy has me concerned. Very little can degrade with a massive flywheel and the losses from nuclear to get it up and spinning would be far lower than say spinning it with motors as an energy store.

Long term I agree though, the complexities around nuclear don’t paint it as our saviour. Maybe for now, and probably the next hundred years, leaning into nuclear is at least harm reduction

Why aim for shutting down nuclear power plants? The carbon emissions per kwh is the lowest out of all methods we have. Even with solar/wind there’s a carbon cost from the materials and maintenence and from what I remember that cost per kwh is higher than nuclear over a long enough time period.

I don’t think you need to have the largest following to have great value, even lemmy as it is right now feels great. I’ll actually want to dive into comment sections compared to the endless scrolling on reddit.

As long as there’s enough people using a platform for a variety of ideas and experience in topics, I think that’s good enough for me.

What a throwback, I remember playing mdk2 when I was young and being utterly confused where to go and giving up shortly after

With modern tech and low latency video solutions and transmission of telemetry, how do we not have auto VSC procedures when an incident happens at key locations that are deemed high risk?

I haven’t watched the footage but I saw a comment about drivers not lifting for seconds before the contact after the initial spin. Surely this is something that’s fixable