Almost as if China is no exception…
Almost as if China is no exception…
Nö kann er eben nicht. Plattenspieler haben einen Eigenklang, das stimmt, aber bei aller Liebe, den hat jedes Glied in der Kette. Auch ein DAC, oder Streamer. Und ein No name Plattenspieler wird idr dem Format Schallplatte nicht gerecht, da geht schon deutlich mehr, mehr Auflösung, mehr Bühne und mehr Bass. Eine gute digitale Kette und eine gute analoge Kette schenken sich nix.
While I see how a law like that would create insecurities in the FOSS world I trust that it will not be abused to shut down FOSS projects as some of the largest EU members like France and Germany are relying heavily on Open Source software. I believe this do be the reason why this cumbersome exception was formulated in the first place.
However it could mean that the blurry line between commercial software and FOSS software could become a clear cut and FOSS projects that provide paid versions of their software could be forced to comply or go back to relying on donations.
tldr: I dont think it will kill FOSS per se. Potentially it will become more difficult to mometize FOSS apart from donations.
I’m a fan of KDEs Akregator. It does a great job as a feed reader and shows the contwnt of an entry in a simplified reader mode. However some feeds jist dont display the full arricle in their feed entries so you’d have to follow a link there. But even thats sth that makes Akregator awesome: you can specify the command thats used to follow a link and most browsers have the option to open a page in reader mode via the commandline. So from what I gathered thia should pretty much do all you want it to and then some.
I use timeshift. It really is the best. For servers I go with restic.
I use a Zoom H5 as an audio interface. It comes with a stereo Microphone that is really good quality and has two XLR connectors for any mic. No issues with Linux as far as drivers etc is concerned + it doubles as a portable recorder.
The downfall of American democracy, like all democracies is lack of protection for its principles. If democracy becomes so radical about the principle of freedom of expression that there is no utterance that isn’'t worthy debating, no matter how debased it is while at the same time anything and everything is up for debate and nothing enshrined in principle democracy becomes its own worst enemy. Freedom of expression becomes the tool with which it destroys itself.
The crux however lies in the fact that if institutions exist that protect democracy from itself, like the Austrian “Verfassungsschutz” , that watch the radical ends of the political spectrum and hamper their political efforts, sometimes trying and convicting individuals as members of a criminal organisation they could easily be accused as stifling democracy.
Ultimately the democratic principle rests upon its subjects willingness to practise it and to participate in it. If enough people are unhappy or uneducated enough to believe in the statements of demagogues and radicals its downfall cannot be stopped by institutionalized violence, political will, or anything else. Democracy cannot defend itself against its own worst enemy: People that for some reason or other have given up on that idea. Democracy therefore will always come with its own 5th column.
What makes a working democracy is that everyone is actively participating in the dicourse and does what they can to stop the 5th column from rising to the top. A working democracy depends on a working educational system that produces strong critical minds. It relies on making sure everyone gets their share and that each and every subject has a stake in a system. Then the 5th Column is small enough to not really damage democracy and there is no instituion necessary to protect it.
These days however the world is far beyond that tipping point. There are enough people unhappy enough with democracy that collective supression no longer works. And its troublesome to watch. I am terrified that someone like Donald Trump could even get to the point where he is the presidential candidate for a major party, let alone serve a term as president of the United States.
Usually these sentiments are met with endless barrages of whataboutism… Literally no one, no matter what they have done with their emails or how many lobal conflicts they started in their term could be a worse president then someone whose aim is to just aimlessly wield power like a European monarch whose mind is impaired by the hereditary conditions that come with generations of incest.