• 6 Posts
  • 310 Comments
Joined 11 个月前
cake
Cake day: 2024年12月9日

help-circle
  • Bullshit. This is not a voluntary thing that parents can choose to do or not: it is an enforced, mandatory requirement that is foisted upon literally all programs, regardless of user choice or whether it makes any sense at all to do so. Oh, and there’s a penalty of TWO HOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS for EACH VIOLATION for EACH CHILD.

    Download a foreign video app on your smart TV that doesn’t comply? Congrats, the pigs will fine a three-child family $7500 for the crime of watching manga.

    You live in the US. You know that this will be unequally applied to the poor and minorities. You know that this will be used as an excuse to search people’s devices at massive scale. You know that companies will simply shrug and use face ID anyway, because they already have to do it for other locales, so why not just reuse the same process? You know that this is a foot in the door for the facists and capitalists. You know all this, so stop running interference for them.




  • Fairly certain you’re being intentionally dense, but I’ll respond in good faith here:

    I already told you the megastructures I want to build: a Lofstrom Loop, then a skyhook, and then an orbital ring. Wikipedia has good descriptions of each. Each would make getting mass into orbit much easier, so you start with the smallest to simplify the larger ones. The Lofstrom Loop would likely cost $10-$30 billion, and reduce cost/kg to a few hundred dollars. The skyhook and orbital ring would be orders of magnitude reductions. With the orbital ring up, we could literally winch payloads up to 80km, ship it around the Earth on maglev, or launch it off to other parts of the solar system - all powered by solar panels. If that’s not ‘sustainable’ in your eyes, I don’t know that further discussion will be productive.





  • astutemuraltoWorldbuilding@lemmy.worldMech cockpit
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 天前

    So basically any serious space fighter pilot would be immersed in oxygenated perfluorocarbon liquid. A healthy human can withstand about 5 gravities for any real length of time (i.e. anything over a fraction of a second). A human in SCUBA gear in a water tank can boost that to 20g. A human breathing perflurocarbon liquid with no air pockets anywhere in their body can withstand roughly 100g. Given that piloted craft are already way less efficient than computer- controlled drones, you would need that level of performance just to make it remotely feasible to have piloted craft. Since we’re already looking at full liquid immersion, an aquatic species is a natural fit.

    Controls? Heck if I know. I’m defaulting to a Battletech-style ‘neurohelmet’ with electrodes that read your brain’s electrical signals. It has the benefit of not needing to wait for the physical movement of your body, but would probably be less accurate. Otherwise a full-body harness that translates the ‘swimming’ motion of the pilot into thrust control could be cool.



  • astutemuraltoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldGotta get those tickets!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 天前

    Alright, I’ll bite. That baby is perfectly fine and probably enjoying watching their mom Do Things (babies love this for some reason). Obviously not the safest being where you could drop a skeeball on them, but Mom is very aware of that I’m sure. Laying face up on the ground is actually safer than trying to precariously hold them and risking dropping them.







  • astutemuraltoWorldbuilding@lemmy.worldMech cockpit
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 天前

    Hey! I had the same idea for four-joystick 'mech control, only with uplifted chimps in a setting I’m dabbling with. Great (maybe) minds think alike I guess.

    I also have Uplifted dolphins piloting space interceptors- they’re better at 3D nav than the primates.