I can now only laugh about their past statements of “uwu we are losing dominance as the market leader because we can’t compete with apple music on iOS, because they can offer the service for less money uwu”

All while no other service is able to compete with them on android because of their special deal lmao

There is. In the battery saver settings, while it’s off, uncheck chat animations > blur in dark theme

They forgot updating the name I guess but disables transparency in light and dark mode for me

They only comply when asked by google/apple because otherwise they risk getting banned on their stores.

That’s why they advice you to, on android, download the app via the web. Because there, these companies have no say and the content is unrestricted.

Not the one you replied to, but I installed lineageos on a old Samsung tab I had laying around and there’s the android native option to ‘pin apps’ which puts the app before the lockscreen basically until you exit the mode manually, meaning you only need to turn on the screen and it’s still protected by password so can’t be used for anything else.

For waking, it’s in the hallway where I have a hue motion sensor. Whenever the sensor notices movement, it’ll send a notification to the tablet with the command to wake the screen and the screen turns on. Pretty easy and straightforward

I’ve been doing mobile device management at my last company and we handed out whatever the latest a series was, to our coworkers, for especially the cost and security factor.

And with the A52 I think, they have become really really decent phones in my opinion, I really don’t know what the hell the writer is fumbling about.

I mean personally it’s not my favorite UI and I would take my pixel any day over it, but it worked so well and was so fluid, for a simple midrange phone. Again, not my cup of tea, but for someone like my mom or whoever just needs a phone for basic social media, calls, texts, decent camera and the web… This is perfectly fine. Now I’d still get her a pixel a series over it because the cam is just perfect imo, but if someone prefers Samsung UI, the a series is incredible.

Plus idk what their current state is but Dex might already be there? Or is coming soon? Judging by the latest Xcover that got it, which also just sports a midrange processor.

I’ve got like 15 psvr2 games in about 150gb storage already. And well, chances are quite high, as I’m playing lots of different games usually.

In total, I just checked, I have 44 games installed. Idk. Some games I just download as I might play them again with friends one day, like GTA online or rainbow 6. I play them like twice a year, but when I do want to play them, I have to download an update first, which is annoying af. Especially as I’m having my ps5 in rest mode anyways.

Question, how many games do you have? Because in the beginning, it was the same for me. But I’ve added an SSD and put an external for my PS4 games and as said, it’s only updating the last played what feels like 15 or so. Anything I have sitting downloaded, almost unused, is never getting updated.

It works just fine if you use the console like ‘vanilla’. Install like 6-10 AAA games that fit in the internal storage and all will be updated, but especially with a psvr2 now that has 20 smaller titles installed for itself, I might not come back to those games for a while and play other games in the meantime, means they won’t get updated. Then I’m playing VR for a week, several different games, take a break for a month and my regular games haven’t been updated.

The play and app store have figured this out by having a check for all updates and update all button, I really wish the ps5 could simply do the same. Or just actually keep all games updated in rest mode without doing anything, that would actually be the best. Because I’m also having my ps5 in rest mode 99% of the time I’m not using it

Also a phones screen is incredible small in comparison. The aspect ratio of nowadays phones is not 16/9 so even with an iPhone pro max you get like about 6" screen vs 8", which is a 30% increase diagonally and results in like 60% more screen area. It’s a very big difference and I really can’t bother playing a game on SUCH a small screen personally, which is why I don’t really use remote play as of now

Yea same. Also I’ve checked on my MacBook yesterday and the highest selectable quality is 720p. Having 1080p in a comfortable device I can easily lay on the couch with … why are people against it so much? It’s awesome, and cheap lol

Funny thing is, if this would’ve been a follow up to the Vita, we would’ve seen the same statements. ‘My steamdeck is more powerful and can play more games lol why do I need this?’. On top it would’ve been more expensive.

Plus the pricing would’ve been a tough pill. The cheap steam deck is 420€, the ‘good’ variant with 256gb is 550€ already. You can buy a ps5 disk version at this price already. Paying something around this for a super specced down ps5 with awful battery life? Who wants that.

On top, people are forgetting Nintendo’s absolute dominance on the handheld market. Most people that are interested in handheld gaming, own a switch. Those who want more performance or emulation on top, got a steam deck already. This device would fill such a niche spot for, again, probably only a bit cheaper than a PS5.

The remote player, for 200€? I can easily afford as addition to my switch for playing games at home, and wherever I want (because I only game in places I have WiFi anyways), with much better quality (1080p60!) while still having good battery life! They say they aim for Dualsense battery life, which people argue is bad, but it’s still like 2 times that of my switch… if they actually achieve that, that’d be insane.

No Bluetooth? Only gives you awful delay tho, someone please try on their phone with remote play and then be quiet for heavens sake. Also never wanted to use headphones on my switch. And if, there’s even a headphone jack? Anyways, the launch date trailers got lots of likes with barely complaints. I think this is just a weird random outcry again

The opposite for me.

When there was the anniversary sale or something in July I decided to upgrade my remaining like 450 day for idk, 35€? Simply because I wanted to play humanity, which cost 30€ already and the new ratchet and clank, which was also like 40€. So it was basically a no-brainer. I also knew it had Alan Wake which I wanted to play, the newer assassin’s creed games, namely origins and Odyssey I always wanted to play but haven’t done yet. Now on sale they are quite cheap anyways but really, this was a nice deal already.

When I found out what else there was to play on there, I was blown away. Death stranding, ghost of Tsushima, even miles morales. I also wanted to buy and play death stranding at some point, the other 2 weren’t really of much interest before; but having them for free, I might as well try them.

This far I only finished r&c and am playing Alan Wake and death stranding, while I uninstalled MP games, to focus myself on actually finishing all the games on my backlog.

Also this month this moving out game was added which I played with friends and it was absolutely hilarious.

Personally, I think I might just get 12months on top while it’s still the old price so I have some time left.

But the increase is steep indeed and it’s wild they’re doing that without any service change. Like ‘hey in return we’re promising an AAA game in every monthly catalog update and a AAA game in every second month of essential free games’

You still get the Russian roulette of maybe 1-2 actually good high quality games a year, 3-4 fun indies and the rest being mid af. For this price? It’s tough…

I’ve seen a post yesterday also about ps5 prices falling in a region, idk what it was anymore and honestly this sounded like a good strategy, business wise. Sell consoles cheaper again, but increase the membership prices to make up for it. Easier to get in for lots of people because they will think the console is cheap, to then be playing high yearly fees basically

Yea I totally agree on that. Although from what I read it sounded like streaming directly onto the console wasn’t possible.

I mean in it wouldn’t really make sense you could not stream a game to the console and from there to the handheld? Maybe that’s what they meant.

And streaming onto the console directly is something they could add in the future. Obviously there’s no guarantee, but it would turn this from a meh device to a very good one imo

Huh that makes even less sense now

That’s the £ price. In the US, these games are $60. In Germany, they are 80€. Baldurs Gate actually sits at 70€, 80€ for the deluxe. I’m super fine with that actually.

1st, you can stream from everywhere, as long as you have WiFi. Not just home. Idk how people are literally unable to read, just like that. I mean how would that even work. It’s made for remote play so it does remote play, simple as that.

2nd, if you have an iPad you want to do this with, fine I guess. Although it wouldn’t be comfortable for me, on the couch or bed, having an iPad I’d have to place somewhere. Phone? Sure, it’s an option, but it’s awfully slow. Personally I only use it when I’m somewhere and have to recheck the settings, download a dlc, or whatever. Other than that, the screen is just way too small. This device will give you more than 60% more screen! And that’s if you have an iPhone 14 pro max. If you have anything smaller, it will probably be somewhere around double the screen.

Lastly, I don’t need any of the other things. Because for that I have my phone, and my phone is free while using it. So I can use my phone as a browser, message friends, or get calls while playing. Just like on my ps5. I’m perfectly fine with that. If I’d use it for streaming the game, I couldn’t really do that comfortably in the first place, second the phone gets really warm using remote play like this, and this in the end will wear down your battery a lot. So I’m happy to have a separate device for it. Also, the so often praised switch doesn’t have a browser either. Not saying it’s fine, but it sucks just as much. The problem is actually more of the ps5 not having a dedicated browser you could also use in game. Would it be comfortable to use? Probably not. But it’s there in the system anyways, just give us an actual app shortcut to it and it’s fine.

In the end it simply comes down to whether you want to afford it. For me it will be a godsend, easily being able to work on my backlog while hanging with my gf. I could play things on the switch but that thing is awfully uncomfortable and the performance is awful. The exclusives are cool but apart from the few that interest one, there’s nothing good to play on, because everything just runs better elsewhere.

A steamdeck is a nice piece of hardware but expensive as hell and the battery life is meh. This says to strive for the same as the Dualsense which in my experience is like 5-7h which for a handheld these days would be very nice. Especially at 1080p60.

I wasn’t really interested in a Sony Handheld, because of fragmentation, specced down games, etc. I just wasn’t fond of playing worse versions of the same games and if it would’ve been like that I would’ve probably never used it, because I could just get to my console. Also for the market it would’ve been utterly useless.

You got the switch that got awesome exclusives. You got the steam deck which is powerful to play games at a good quality and also got emulation on its side, which is a nice upgrade over the switch. And with Sony you would have… Sony exclusive, but hope that the devs patch their games into a worse quality version, just for the handheld to cost as much as a ps5? Who would buy into that? Now you can just take your ps5 in all its glory on the go, which is amazing. And it comes at a super cheap price of 200€.

Again, you can use other devices but a dedicated handheld is more comfortable to me

I mean as much as I’d like to be saving money as well, and the other comment saying every game company charging this nowadays, simply because everyone else does… I agree

But also, the game has gotten incredible reviews. There was quite a lot about this game setting the bar for gaming and game developers. In that regard, honestly, I’m fine paying that price.

What I’m not fond of is yearly releases, charging that price for a game that is like a dlc to last years game and got so much MTX it could very well be f2p. Cough cod and FIFA

I’ve tried it when there was a timed trial like 1 or 2 years ago already?

It looked very fun to me, apart from the bugs, but like the trailers. The world seemed to be interesting, the gunplay seemed to be really cool, etc.

When I got to play it felt like GTA but with like zombie NPCs. Whatever it was, they felt really uncanny and not real.

However, I kept playing since I wanted to shoot some guns really bad. When I finally got to it in this training area, it felt not satisfying at all? The aiming curve seemed completely weird and there was also what felt like a big delay when aiming. Really made me put the game down

It’s awesome really. At this price, I can see myself buying this. I don’t play on the go anyways, either at home or at my parents.

The PlayStation fambase is kinda ridiculous because on the one hand they’re bothered by games being developed for the PS4 still, arguably downgrading them; while then wishing for an even worse handheld console and expecting devs would support it.

It would’ve caused awful fragmentation in the current ecosystem. Having your ps5 on the go is really the best they could’ve done.

Also, people complaining about latency but also complaining Bluetooth isn’t supported. Make up your mind. I’m happy for this new PlayStation link thing. For the people that don’t understand, it’s basically the 2.4ghz adapter that comes with every headset, being built into the hardware, as Xbox has had it for years. Not requiring you to need that dongle anymore. Having that also on the handheld is perfect for good quality, low latency audio.

The only thing I really don’t get is why you can’t connect to the ps premium streaming directly from the handheld. Wishful thinking it just wasn’t ready in time and will get added later, because connecting to a server would be cheaper, and faster if you’re far from home, than your actual console. Obviously it would also give the great benefit of having games at hand without installing, updating, etc.

How? I’ve been a heavy telegram user for more than 8 years now. Not a single time I have unwillingly been added to a group I had no interest in or been messaged with any scam message.

I know of privacy settings that limit these, but I have none of them turned on, because I have some people that might add me to important groups.

I mean I’d like to follow that advice, but my coffee consumption is quite low actually. I usually drink half a cup of coffee a day. Some days 2 half. And this only in the morning.

The problem is that if I don’t, I tend to get quite the bad migraine around noon. So I prefer to simply have it. Also it does boost my mood and productivity in the morning a lot. I don’t really feel like I need to stop it, but I appreciate your advice, I do know some people who drink an awful lot of coffee which even I find kinda disturbing.