Which I assume is why her familial relationship was not the focus of the article.

Oh yes, I totally agree with the person calling for attacking the media, how dare they see a thing that happened and tell me about it! Truly deserving of a death sentence.

It’s an interesting wager that more people hate than not. I don’t think it’s compatible with the upcoming generations’ perspectives, which is why I assume they are investing so much into radicalizing children on social media. More soldiers for the culture war.

Lol. I guess it’s hard to tell when you haven’t seen the site change over time but… yeah?

It uses to be “argumentless” discussions on esoteric tech and philosophy issues… then a few years later it was people commenting the same 9 memes for 9,000 comments… then a few years later suddenly everyone’s anecdotes are praising China, or capitalism, or offhandedly mentioning some product or influencer.

Tbh tho, most of Reddit now just reads like Subreddit Simulator. All of the site’s value regarding sincere, unique, and detailed user content… yeah, that’s gone. They’re just coasting on past laurels, will be fun to watch the wheels fall off as the data stays locked in 2023, before the LLM Ouroboros.

https://freakonomics.com/podcast/americas-hidden-duopoly-2/

Listen to this then tell me what your choice is.

Just one of those days.

So cool.

The population always pays. Why?

Build a guillotine, leave it outside of City Hall.

See if they can find the money then.

Go to a local video game bar and play socially there.

No shit.

We’ve reached the stage of capitalism where the middle class is being actively devoured by corporations.

Line go up.

Yep, it’s a control thing.

If you can command a population to sacrifice women to childbirth in waves, and they don’t revolt, what else can you command them to do?

That is actually great. Are there more of these? I’d love to read the whole fake “feud” if it’s ongoing, sounds hilarious.

This application looks fine to me.

Clearly labeled sections.

Local on one side, remote on the other

Transfer window on bottom.

No space for anything besides function, is the joke going over my head?

Omg you’re right. That means I can check Wikipedia, he is 82 years old.

Now please OP, update the image. For no one shall disrespect THA HAWWWWGGZ THAT’S RIGHT I WAS ONE THE WHOLE TIME CRAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNN…

Wow, a result that is wrong for some reason. I don’t know that reason but as soon as I turn on Fox News they will tell me what to think. Then I’m gonna be mad as shit at this!!!

Right now not sure how to feel though.

When you get caught not doing your job.

I agree with the comedy image.

The only thing worse than the squalor of addiction is the unearned confidence of people with glasses.

Yeah but how old is red face white hair man.

It would be more accurate if you said, “This is not about right and wrong (for me).”

If you say it’s not about right and wrong, dead stop, then you are pledging full faith to the institutions, the very ones we are critiquing.

Basically, you are dismissing my opinion as misguided, dismissing me as missing the point and I am telling you it was expressed exactly as intended.

In short, you are arguing on the wrong conceptual meta-level for me to respond without dismissing my own claim. If I take as True that “this isn’t about right and wrong” (it is), then I am setting aside the power I have in a democratic society to say, “Fuck this I’m changing it.” Maybe we’ve just been stuck in gridlock politics, with a ruling class that strips and monetizes every aspect of humanity that the society today doesn’t realize the power citizens wield.

Not sure. Been fun to think and share thoughts with you though. Thanks for your time and have a nice night.

An impasse is a perfectly acceptable outcome on a sane platform like Lemmy.

It’s a quote of an opinion, so in general I ignore them. I’m usually more interested in distilling ideas constructed with some line of reasoning.

But I guess we can look at this one. Find it’s essence. Tho it doesn’t seem very deep…

“Societies with rule of law are dictatorships. How leaders are selected and the existence of fundamental Constitutional rights is not a factor.”

So in short.

Having laws at all is a dictatorship.

Yeah, that is one of the opinions I’d ignore. It’s easy to have that opinion inside the walls of a lawed society.

Luckily it is valid to respond to an opinion with an opinion, and mine is that I imagine everyone (except the strongest with the most resources) would abandon that perspective as soon as they lived in a world with no laws.