Short overview of how good the nesting capabilities of various 3D slicer are.

The task is simple: placing as many of these shapes on a 200x300mm printed as possible. Manual (quick and dirty for reference): 6 pcs.

Ranking:

  1. Ultimaker Cura: 7 pcs.
  2. human (me): 6 pcs.
  3. Orca slicer: 5 pcs.
  4. PrusaSlicer & BCN3D stratos: 4 pcs. By switching (for this particular part) from the worst (Prusa) to the best (Cura) slicer the nesting performance improved by a whopping 75%!

Ultimaker Cura:

Prusa:

BCN3D Stratos (forked from an old version of Cura):

OrcaSlicer:

  • Dem Bosain
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Did you turn on Automatic Rotations in Prusaslicer? By default it’s left off and just tiles your part when you duplicate it.

    • EmilieEvans@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Default settings. Where is the option to rotate it?

      Providing it manually with 90° rotated and using the auto arrange instead of fill bed: 5 pcs. Still not a great result.

      • Dem Bosain
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Right click on the auto- arrange icon. I think the checkbox is in there.

        Yeah, it’s still not great.

      • carzian@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        There’s also a setting for minimum spacing between parts. The default is overly cautious iirc, I’d suggest lowering it and trying again, though I don’t expect it to change much

        • EmilieEvans@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Improved but still not a match to Ultimaker Cura.

          Prusa is very slow compared to Cura as PrusaSlicer needs every option checked including Geometry handling accurate to sometimes get 7 pcs. matching Cura performance. If the result is 7 or 6 pcs. depends on where the part originally was placed on the print bed (or luck? run to run variance?). Not a reliable software for nesting.

          With fast and balanced setting it only does 6 pcs.

          fast:

          balanced:

          accurate: