A career State Department official resigned from her post on Tuesday, saying she could no longer work for the Biden administration after it released a report concluding that Israel was not preventing the flow of aid to Gaza.

Stacy Gilbert, who served as a senior civilian-military advisor to the State Department’s Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration (PRM), sent an email to staff saying she was resigning because she felt the State Department had made the wrong assessment, The Washington Post reported, citing officials who read the note.

The report was filed in response to President Joe Biden issuing a national security memorandum (NSM-20) in early February on whether the administration finds credible Israel’s assurances that its use of US weapons do not violate either American or international law.

The report said there were reasonable grounds to believe Israel on several occasions had used American-supplied weapons “inconsistent” with international humanitarian law, but said it could not make a definitive assessment - enough to prevent the suspension of arms transfers.

  • snooggums
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    No, Biden has the brand recognition and is the party’s best chance to win. His administration does do a terrible job of selling the good things he is doing and he is shooting himself in the foot by not following through on his ‘red line’ with Rafah, but that isn’t enough of a negative to outweigh the lnown factor.

    It sucks that winning a first past the post election based on the electoral college is how it works instead of something like ranked choice, but that is where we are at.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      46
      ·
      1 month ago

      Biden isn’t going to win dude. He’s losing, hard L style right now.

      Its not an issue with fptp, its not strategic voting.

      He’s a shitty candidate that was always a comprise/ most-least preferred candidate and he’s not going to win.

      Continuing to make the arguments that we need to stick with Biden is basically arguing to give the election to Trump.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 month ago

        He’s a shitty candidate [who] was always a [compromise?]/ most-least preferred candidate and he’s not going to win.

        Shitty compared to whom? To the leading republican? Are you high?

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          “Generic Democrat” polls 12 points higher than Biden.

          You are leaving 12 points on the table with Biden. Interestingly, this is also the differential polling error associated with a Biden/ Trump head to head.

          12 points is about the number Biden needs to be leading Trump to be ‘confident’ in victory. So quite literally “Any generic Democrat” is a less shitty candidate than Biden.

        • ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’ve concluded and am pretty sure of my conclusions that in this context yes, people be high as FUCK

      • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        So what’s your solution? Who has a better shot at winning the election in November if they started campaigning today? I want a specific name and why you think it would work. You know better than everyone, this should be easy for you (everyone else, watch for this sidestep and refusal to actually answer or back up anything).

        You’re really good at claiming (almost to a point of preference) that Biden will lose and why we shouldn’t support them but not once have you provided anything of value that people can take action on. Everything you post appears to be designed to make people more apathetic and less likely to be involved, why is that?

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          Its not my job to give you a solution. I just need you to be real about the probability of failure of the strategy that you seem to be pot-committed to. And to be clear, we haven’t had a convention yet, so there is still time to change.

          I’m offering you an analysis that makes a conclusion, that based on current polling, Biden can’t win this election. You might find it unpalatable, but that’s not my problem. Hope is a false

          But this isn’t new news’. Biden has been struggling in this way for over a year, before Israel/ Gaza became hot. Biden’s chances have gone from “rough” to “very unlikely”. He’s actively working to distance himself from the positions of his base. Instead of rejecting Trump’s policy positions, he adopts them. Biden is catering to a non-existent center. It seems like he genuinely thinks that some republican voters are going to show up for him. There is 0 evidence from the previous three elections that any voters are convertible.

          On the other side, maybe he gets laughed at, but Trump is going to the places that voters are and trying to get them (the sneaker thing, libertarian convention). Trump is trying to win this election. You win elections post 2016 by growing a base and driving them out to vote. It worked for Trump in 2016. It worked for Biden in 2020: Biden took on the most progressive platform in recent history to grow his base to include progressives.

          Whats Biden’s platform in 2024? I don’t know about you but I have no fucking clue based on the campaigns messaging. Its all, just like you are parroting here, about how bad Trump is. And while you might find that convincing enough, there are obviously enough voters out there (about 12%) who don’t and that you can’t win the election without.

          So I’m sorry. It hurts if he’s your hucklebee, but the guy can’t win right now. He’s statistically lost at this point. If beating Trump really is your goal, then you need to come up with a better candidate. Continuing to push for Biden when he can’t win dooms us all.

          • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 month ago

            See… this is the problem with discussing these things with people like you. You were asked a simple question as a rebuttal to your suggestion that people not vote for Biden, and you have no answer.

            I’ve asked this same question to nearly every one of you that I’ve spoke with on the subject.

            None of you can answer it.

                  • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    That you can’t understand implied meaning isn’t my fault. You came in here with the intent to disrupt by answering a question unrealistically.

                    You’re proving my point for me.

                    None of you have anything to offer yet want even to not vote for Biden.

                    No one is wondering why anymore.

            • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              Making a criticism doesn’t require that I have a solution to the problem that’s been set up by the insistence that Biden be the nominee. If that leaves you feeling incomplete, that’s your issue.

              • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Complaining about something while offering no solutions and expecting to be taken seriously is about as fucking stupid as not voting and expecting things to change.

                You were asked a simple question, that for all the talk you people seem to do here- should be simple to answer…

                But NONE of you can answer it. It’s litetally your shut down code. And I’m going to ensure that everyone knows it.

                • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I just don’t think your attempt to derail the primary thrust of my point is worth answering. I didn’t comment about who else might run or how well they would be doing.

                  You are trying to engage in a red-herring fallacy, and the royal “we” (since you used the royal “you”) are dutifully ignoring it.

                  There being or not being other viable candidates is irrelevant to Bidens chances at winning. Its a non-sequitur. If its important to you, you should come up with an answer to that question. I would be interested to hear what you come back with.

                  • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    Nope. That might work on the high school kids you’re used to arguing with, but I’m holding you to the wheelhouse of the topic:

                    Your inability to answer a simple question. You can either answer it, or admit your entire argument is flawed.

                    You come here and ask people to not vote for Biden, without suggesting an alternative. So either you’re actively trying to get Trump elected, or you don’t know how elections work.

                    Either answer the question, or admit to one of the aforementioned.

                    Your choice.

          • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            You keep saying Biden needs to be replaced but there’s literally no candidate to replace him with that beats Trump. If you’re so sure we need to ditch Biden, and you’re not advocating for Trump to win, it seems pretty fair to ask what you think should happen. Until you do that it’s pretty clear you’re just spewing bullshit in bad faith.

            • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Until you do that it’s pretty clear you’re just spewing bullshit in bad faith.

              Sigh… Just because some one is pointing out the flaws in your approach to electoralism doesn’t mean they are acting in bad faith. Pretending that everyone who has a perspective you disagree with is out to get you is a poor way to go through life.

              Recognizing that Biden can’t win is step one. There really is no point in a discussion around alternatives until that point is accepted. We can’t turn this ship until collectively, people understand that this guy isn’t going to win the election. It has to show up in mass, in the polling, and in the collective conversation.

              As far as determining an alternative, there is a straightforward mechanism for that. Its called a convention, and conveniently, there is already one scheduled. Supreme court decided post 2016 that Dem’s can do whatever the fuck they want. So delegates go to the convention unaffiliated and we figure it out there.

              It really doesn’t matter who the nominee is, so long as its neither Biden or Hillary. Any generic Democratic governor or senator will do fine. Trump is deeply unpopular. The problem we’re up against is that some how, Biden has managed his presidency in such a way as to be more unpopular than Trump.

              • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                And I’m telling you, there is no viable candidate you can nominate that has a better chance than Biden. “Generic Democrat” isn’t a candidate. Who’s polling better and is willing to run?

                  • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    30 days ago

                    So then what take should I have to prevent Trump from winning? Specifics. You know what works, tell us. So far I’ve got:

                    1. Biden is bad and will lose
                    2. ???

                    Why can’t you defend anything you say? Why do you need to try and dodge questions and play rhetorical games? I have had 1 simple question this entire time and you won’t answer it.

          • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            ROFL! She’s not even running. My god man… you people really need representation. You’re al over the place. How on earth can you expect to be taken seriously when you answer a question about who can beat Trump in the 2024 election….

            And your answer is someone that’s not even running?

            Get someone to speak for you if you want to be taken seriously.

            • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              The question:

              So what’s your solution? Who has a better shot at winning the election in November if they started campaigning today?

              I answered it. Now, you’re moving the goalposts and they have to be running? And you want me to take you seriously? Lol

              • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                You’re mistaken, I never once said “if they start campaigning today.”

                And even if she started campaigning, she STILL doesn’t have a chance.

                • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Oh really:

                  Whitmer insists she has no interest in replacing Biden on the ticket this fall, but experts say the governor could be a top pick for Democrats should the president still decide — or be forced — to bow out of the race.

                  • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    Really. That was written in January, and it’s essentially an op-ed piece.

                    Come on man. Do better.

        • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Exactly this. Ask them every time. And none of them ever have an answer. They’re not here to support third party candidates- they’re here to sway votes away from Biden.

      • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        And suggesting people vote third party when it is well known that not one of them have a remote chance to win, is purposefully trying to give the election to Trump.