• Mjpasta710
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Science is about testable repeatable actions and concepts. Science describes what can be observed.

    What can be observed and tested in your claims?

    • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Where did i say that it should be scientifically proven? I merely reject the idea that it is scientifically disproven or to claim that what has no scientific proof does not exist. This kind of thinking has rejected microorganisms, atoms, gravity and many other nowadays established things. Heck people acknowledge it to be perfectly reasonable to theorize about the existence of dark matter that is unobservable to us and holding the universe together.

      It is simply unscientifc to claim to have “facts” against what is written in the scriptures as they describe events from 1400 to 5000 years ago. Not believing in them is perfectly valid, but it needs to be acknowledged as a matter of believe, a matter of faith and is in such in no way more valid than the believe that a scripture is true.

      • Mjpasta710
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Things that exist, can be scientifically proven. We have evidence for the presence of dark matter. This is a placeholder for something we don’t know what it is yet.

        We don’t have evidence of gods in any way that can be tested.

        “What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence” - hitchens razor