An image of JD Vance allegedly dressed as a woman and wearing a blonde wig was posted to X, formerly known as Twitter, on Sunday. The unconfirmed image quickly picked up steam and began trending under the hashtag #SofaLoren, a reference to the iconic Italian actress Sophia Loren and false claims that the Republican senator had sex with a couch.
ā¦
Many commenters online connected Vanceās alleged history of cross-dressing with his legislative historyāwhich has long been a point ofĀ concernĀ for LGBTQ+ advocacy groups.
The Ohio senator introduced the āProtect Childrenās Innocence Act,ā whichĀ aims to criminalizeĀ medical institutions that provide gender-affirming care to minors.
The Republican vice presidential pick also supports measures to limit classroom discussion of sexual orientation and gender identity, and labeled critics of so-called ādonāt say gayā legislationĀ āgroomers.ā
You are stating the literal hypocrisy and saying it isnāt hypocrisy. I have no idea what nuance you are saying is there.
Pointing out hypocrisy is actually fairly effective with uninformed people. If they have only a passing interest in JD couch molester, but are made aware of his anti-trans/drag legislation at the same time they find out he was cool doing it himself, they will be likely to not believe his bullshit in the future. No, it wonāt swing his base who are already on the cognitive dissonance express, but it might help motivate someone on the fence to get out and vote against him.
deleted by creator
The ārules for thee but not for meā kind of hypocrisy is extremely important.
deleted by creator
I think thereās just a disagreement with your core premise.
There is a subset of people that are not engaged and unaware of Vanceās legislative history or public statements regarding drag. Those people will generally not engage with long thoughtful nuanced discourse. Those are the people that pointing out hypocrisy speaks to. An article or long post just doesnāt work. A quick meme does. Itās a simple cognitive shortcut to get them engaged, and itās effective. Yes, I get a bit of masturbatory joy when I see that stuff, but it shouldnāt be meant for me. This stuff is meant to go āviralā so it gets in front of the non-engaged eyeballs.
We need to use every single goddamn tool in the toolbox we have to engage people and get them to turn out. All of it. Including pointing out hypocrisy.
deleted by creator
Fair enough on the terminology.
So attacking their obsession is okay, but taking it one step further and explaining that theyāre not only obsessed but hypocritical somehow makes it out of bounds?
I am truly trying to understand your point, and I think others have too, but it simply isnāt there. Can you just specifically say what you would like to see written when communicating this information to someone? What specifically do you want said about JD Vance when someone posts this photo? I think that might help.
deleted by creator
It was a question, trying to understand what the hell youāre trying to say. Donāt really think itās fair to call that āwildly mischaracterizedā but you do you.
Happy to move on. You should really work on communicating your thoughts though. Youāre not making any sense and wasting a bunch of peopleās time who are trying to engage with you in good faith, and then getting combative when itās pointed out. We canāt see eye to eye while youāre facing the other direction.