• DragonTypeWyvern
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    But it is indicitive of the Anglo-Saxon propensity for bootlicking. /Celtposting

    • WldFyre@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      The French do their arguably dumber “you can’t call that thing you made what I call it even though it’s the same recipe, because it wasn’t grown where my ancient relatives made it,” though. Also France’s general xenophobia and owning a bona fide colony way later than the Anglos lol

      • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        You’re talking about AOP (Appelation d’Origine Protégée / Protected Origin Naming). It makes senses because protected names are place names. You can’t call any sparkling wine “champagne”. It has to come from Champagne. However, you can call your raw milk cheese “faisselle” even if it wasn’t made in Rians, as faisselle isn’t a place.

        • MartianSands@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          By that logic, you should object to cheese being labelled as “cheddar” cheese, because that’s a place too and you’ve almost certainly never seen cheese which came from there.

          It’s a stupid rule

          • Squizzy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I wouldnt see it as stupid, people and governments want to protect what they produce.

            If it doesnt matter then have prosecco and everyone is happy.