That’s not just one interpretation, it’s literally what the article says. I see absolutely no value in this rule given that articles often use clickbait titles that obscure the actual content. However, if you miss reddit then feel free to go back there, or make your own community where you can enforce whatever rules you like.
Too bad Reddit, Gab and others are already doing a great (horrible) job at it already. Lemmy atleast has the audacity to put titles as they were intended to be.
deleted by creator
That’s not just one interpretation, it’s literally what the article says. I see absolutely no value in this rule given that articles often use clickbait titles that obscure the actual content. However, if you miss reddit then feel free to go back there, or make your own community where you can enforce whatever rules you like.
deleted by creator
Only if you knew how editoriaised reddit garbage is… I doubt you do not, and you just want your neoliberal biases slapped everywhere.
deleted by creator
Too bad Reddit, Gab and others are already doing a great (horrible) job at it already. Lemmy atleast has the audacity to put titles as they were intended to be.
I bet you would support the “corrected” title of this article (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/02/09/earthquake-syria-sanctions-assad/) instead of the original correct title that was originally archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20230210102455/https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/02/09/earthquake-syria-sanctions-assad/).
I hope you are not another soferman, because if you are, I am around here. :)
deleted by creator
Thanks for using alts to downvote others’ comments while you upvote your own. It will still not help your lib redditor brain too much.