…Yet it seems safe to say that the world no longer trusts U.S. promises, and perhaps no longer fears U.S. threats, the way it used to. The problem, however, isn’t Biden; it’s the party that reflexively attacks him for anything that goes wrong.

Right now America is a superpower without a fully functioning government. Specifically, the House of Representatives has no speaker, so it can’t pass legislation, including bills funding the government and providing aid to U.S. allies. The House is paralyzed because Republican extremists, who have refused to acknowledge Biden’s legitimacy and promoted chaos rather than participating in governance, have turned these tactics on their own party. At this point it’s hard to see how anyone can become speaker without Democratic votes — but even less extreme Republicans refuse to reach across the aisle.

And even if Republicans do somehow manage to elect a speaker, it seems all too likely that whoever gets the job will have to promise the hard right that he will betray Ukraine.

Given this political reality, how much can any nation trust U.S. assurances of support? How can we expect foreign enemies of democracy to fear America when they know that there are powerful forces here that share their disdain?

  • Jeremy [Iowa]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    An opinion article which lambasts a party while pretending another is pristine? Surely there’s no agenda to such balanced persuasion…

    • spaceghoti@lemmy.oneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anyone who has even a passing familiarity with Krugman knows he’s never going to describe the Democrats as anything like “pristine.” But pretending “both sides are the same” is insanely dishonest.

      • Jeremy [Iowa]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is that more, less, or about the same intentional dishonesty as portraying one side as pristine and flawless and the other as the exact opposite?

        • spaceghoti@lemmy.oneOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That thing you accuse him of, but he didn’t do?

          Back under your bridge, now. We’re done here.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Guys, guys… I see the reports on both sides. Nothing here (so far) is actionable from a mod perspective. Take a break. Cool it down. Agree to disagree. Krugman definitely has a bias, this is why it’s an opinion piece. It’s cool. Opinions are allowed.

            • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Guys, guys… I see the reports on both sides. Nothing here (so far) is actionable from a mod perspective. Take a break. Cool it down. Agree to disagree. Krugman definitely has a bias, this is why it’s an opinion piece. It’s cool. Opinions are allowed.