• aberrate_junior_beatnik
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It is the answer to the “problem” most people care about: unhoused people being visible.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      My wife is a library administrator and they are working on putting up a library branch in a poorer part of town, and people came to the board meeting to object, because it would attract more of “them” to the area. As if there weren’t plenty of homeless people there already.

    • phorq@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Reminds me of an announcement the dean made on Community: “In order to increase awareness of homelessness, security has been given binoculars”

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What’s so fucked to me is that giving them housing would do the same thing, it would make them less visible.

      If that’s what they really wanted, they could be convinced to fund housing for the homeless.

      They can’t be convinced, ergo the cruelty is the point.