• 9 Posts
  • 649 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle
  • This feels a bit like nitpicking about the description of the dining hall layout of a post about the titanic sinking, but I don’t get these units. Well, specifically I don’t get the inclusion of hiroshima & nagasaki. The US technically dropped 10 tons of ordinance on those cities; but if you’re looking at the TNT rating, it was about 40 kilotons total.






  • Yep, her abusive ex-husband, whom she tried to leave, but was told to reconcile with if she wanted to make the Olympics. He was trying to promote his bodyguard business, so he had someone attack Kerrigan. As to her involvement, it’s he-said-she-said. She could have come up with the idea, or only learned of it after the fact. I’m inclined to believe her over her abuser, but it really is guesswork.

    If anyone is interested in the story, Sarah Marshall’s Remote Control is mandatory reading. She also talks about it on the You’re Wrong About podcast.








  • aberrate_junior_beatnikto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneFun fact rule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    27 days ago

    As much as I dislike billionaires and think we have a huge problem with school shootings, the math on this doesn’t check out. According to Forbes there are more than 2,500 billionaires; 2,500/60 > 40 per day. I didn’t dig too deep on the stats for school shootings (because oof), but thankfully we’re not there. There are so, so many more than could be, and it’s a horrible tragedy that we’re doing nothing about, but we aren’t there.






  • Could you elaborate? Because I’m confused by what you could mean here. What is the broader policy that they disagree with? You say they “did agree with the specific neopronouns policy”, so it seems like you are saying they agree that “harassment based on gender or neopronouns [should] remain prohibited—even if the user in question was suspected of being a troll”? If the broader policy is a policy of “respect for trans identities”, it seems like the only thing about the policy they have a problem with is its respect for trans identities.