• 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    6 months ago

    Probably not testing, but rather demonstrating to potential buyers (the pig in the background). It sells better, and demonstrates the seller’s conviction that the product works.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Yeah, I don’t know how anyone would think this was “the first test”

      It was a demonstration to potential buyers (cops) that it worked.

      The makers didn’t just strap on their first prototype without knowing it would stop a bullet yet.

      This was after they knew it would work.

      I think OP is just grabbing posts from “fakehistoryporn” off Reddit and not understanding the difference…

      Just another of the (probably hundreds) of shitty meme communities OP mods or posts too. At this point I’m just blocking their whole account.

      • PugJesus@kbin.socialOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Mind mentioning where I said this was the first test?

        I think OP is just grabbing posts from “fakehistoryporn” off Reddit and not understanding the difference…

        You do realize that’s not the kind of material “fakehistoryporn” posts, right? It would be labeled something more like “Experimental worm-removal by shockwave, 1865”

        Just another of the (probably hundreds) of shitty meme communities OP mods or posts too. At this point I’m just blocking their whole account.

        That’s what the block button is there for.

          • PugJesus@kbin.socialOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            6 months ago

            “Test - a procedure intended to establish the quality, performance, or reliability of something, especially before it is taken into widespread use”

              • PugJesus@kbin.socialOPM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                14
                ·
                6 months ago

                This is quite literally a procedure intended to establish the quality, performance, or reliability of the vest. The quality, performance, and reliability of the vest is likely established to the creators, but not to those observing.

                This is a really weird piece of semantics to get caught up on.

                • snooggums@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  14
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  No, this is a demonstration of the quality, performance, or reliability of the vest. They had already established the quality, performance, or reliability of the vest when the tested it prior to the demonstration.

                  I know you are trying to use ‘establish’ to mean ‘establish in the minds of’ or something like that, but the whole meme is based on misleading the viewer to believe that this was the step where they made sure it worked. The joke is pretending this is a test and not a demonstration. It wouldn’t be nearly as funny if it was an actual test.

                  In this case the semantics are the entire joke and important.

                  • PugJesus@kbin.socialOPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 months ago

                    You have fun with making this argument over demonstrably wrong semantics. I’m done with trying to read off the dictionary to someone with no intent of listening.

                • NOSin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  If you have to get into semantics to get your point across, you probably fucked up the communication part somewhere.

                  • PugJesus@kbin.socialOPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    If someone raises a semantic issue that depends on deliberately ignoring a common usage of the word, is it the issue of the original speaker, or the one raising an issue that deliberately ignores common usage?

        • JungleJim@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          It’s in the text of the meme you posted. How embarrassing for you Thank you for sharing with the group. Sorry for being rude.

          • PugJesus@kbin.socialOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            6 months ago

            It’s in the text of the meme you posted. How embarrassing for you

            “Testing the first bulletproof vests” =/= “First tests of the bulletproof vests”

            These aren’t literally the first bulletproof vests, but nowhere in the text of the meme is it asserted that these are the first tests of the bulletproof vests.

            Perhaps you could learn how to parse basic English before trying to act smug?

            • JungleJim@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              6 months ago

              Sorry if I actually hurt your feelings. I might have joked too hard in the meme post.

              I don’t think your post was really accurate, since the first bullet proof vest was attempted in 1538 according to Wikipedia so it’s not really the first, or a test.

              But I didn’t actually want to make you feel bad, so I’m sorry for that. I hope you have a good day despite me.

    • EatYouWell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      People still do it today. There was a bullet proof glass company where the CEO (iirc, might have been owner) sat in a car with their windshield and let someone shoot at it with a rifle.

    • drcobaltjedi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah this is whats actually happening. The inventor of the bullet proof vest would litterally get shot to show how safe it made the wearer.