Missouri Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft said that while he didn’t want to do it, he had to remind people of how “severe” the situation is.

A top Republican official in Missouri is threatening to remove President Joe Biden from appearing on the ballot as retaliation for the determination in two other states that Donald Trump doesn’t qualify because he “engaged in insurrection.”

“What has happened in Colorado & Maine is disgraceful & undermines our republic,” Missouri Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft wrote on the social media site X on Friday. “While I expect the Supreme Court to overturn this, if not, Secretaries of State will step in & ensure the new legal standard for @realDonaldTrump applies equally to @JoeBiden!”

Ashcroft’s post came shortly after the Supreme Court agreed to review a decision by Colorado’s high court that found Trump could be barred from the state’s primary ballot because of his actions leading up to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.

  • FaeDrifter
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    You should actually be more worried that violent insurrection becomes the norm.

      • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Actually, the far right are more likely to turn to violence every time they lose, period. That’s always been the way of things. You’re conflating the Left’s values with the Right. The Right do not care about Democracy. Have you never sat through one of those fascist fucks “we’re not a Democracy, we’re a Republic” defense of minority tyranny? They care about winning at all costs. They’re as likely to turn violent is they lose 90/10 as if they lose because their leader was convicted of a felony or taken off a ballot for legitimate reasons.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If fascist win after having Trump removed from the ballot then it makes it even harder to legitimately argue that a particular candidate should stay on a future ballot.

          • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If fascists take over the US, there will never be another legitimate election whether or not we take the correct legal action prior to that point.

            But we’re talking Beer Hall Putsch leniency on Trump, and all that does is empower the actual fascists to take more extreme action knowing they will never face consequences. People are terrified that if they don’t give in to fascists, fascists won’t play fair.

            Guess what? Fascists already won’t play fair.

              • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sure. Show me proof the good guys aren’t playing fair taking an insurrectionist off the Ballot because the Constitution demands it.

                  • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Preponderance of evidence. The first state concluded the opposite. And the court system seems the right place to challenge.

                    Or are you suggesting all 50 states need to unanimously agree or he gets off? Because that goes to being a higher burden of proof instead of a lower one.

      • FaeDrifter
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Whose democratic options to express themselves is being taken away?

        Statistically it is non-white people, so why is it white people who are turning to violence?

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Whose democratic options to express themselves is being taken away?

          MAGA voters.

          why is it white people who are turning to violence

          Because they are MAGA voters?

          • FaeDrifter
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            How are MAGA voters losing the democratic options to express themselves?

              • FaeDrifter
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago
                1. Are you aware the Constitution sets out requirements for eligibility for president? Just because your feelings say you really want a particular person, it doesn’t mean you have a constitutional right to vote for them. For example, maybe I really want Arnold Schwarzenegger for president. Just because I prefer Arnold that does not mean he can be president.

                2. Trumpers could vote for Trump in 2020 and they still staged a violent insurrection. So your point is both stupid and moot.

                • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Are you aware the Constitution sets out requirements for eligibility for president?

                  Yes. Trump was impeached for incitement of insurrection but acquitted in the Senate. That’s the constitutional rules being followed.

                  Just because your feelings say you really don’t want a particular person, it doesn’t mean you have a constitutional right to exclude them.

                  Trumpers could vote for Trump in 2020 and they still staged a violent insurrection.

                  Consider how violent Trumpers could get if they couldn’t vote.

                  • FaeDrifter
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    acquitted in the Senate

                    Factually incorrect, either you don’t know what is going on, or you’re lying. The Senate failed to remove him as president, that is all. There is an ongoing criminal case during which Trump was indicted this past year. There has been no acquittal, contrary to your claim.

                    Just because your feelings say you really don’t want a particular person, it doesn’t mean you have a constitutional right to exclude them.

                    I agree 100%. I don’t want Biden or any of the other GOP candidates either. And yet, none of them have so far staged and supported an insurrection. I only think candidates should be discluded based on law.

                    I’m logically consistent, which is something you are not capable of understanding.

                    Consider how violent Trumpers could get if they couldn’t vote.

                    Well, Trumpers are extremely delusional and very stupid. So, they will get very violent, even though Trumpers have the most to lose and least to gain from an actual Civil War 2.

                    One massive trumper delusion is that they are the only ones with guns. In reality, leftists, anarchists, anti-fascists, and communists have a ridiculous amount of firepower stored.

                    The big difference is that Trumpers paint a big target on themselves and their homes, flying Trump flags and wearing trump merch. Trumpers are not ready to fight a war against an enemy they can’t find. They’re like the Redcoats of the American Revolution, they are big loud and meant to intimidate, they are not ready to fight an actual bloody war of attrition against an enemy they cannot see.