When confronted with basic questions on “60 Minutes,” the group appeared ill-prepared and stumped and alleged their critics were trying to “marginalize us.”

Since its founding in 2021, the conservative organization Moms for Liberty has billed itself as a champion for “parents’ rights,” pushing campaigns across the country to ban books and the use of pronouns in schools. Their crusade, as my colleague Kiera Butler has reported, often alleges that educators, specifically in public education, are out to “groom” and “indoctrinate” kids.

But what, exactly, does that mean? It doesn’t appear as though Moms for Liberty knows either.

In an interview with 60 Minutes host Scott Pelley that aired on Sunday night, the group’s two co-founders repeatedly struggled to explain their platform beyond empty talking points that have fueled the culture war in schools. They also failed to present facts to back up various claims.

  • frezik
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    4 months ago

    Moms for Liberty was already on the way to dying out. Wait a year or two, though, and another org like them will pop up. Conservatives need to keep repackaging the same bad ideas because they think the messaging was the problem, not that the idea is bad.

    Back in the 70s, Anita Bryant was saying:

    What these people really want, hidden behind obscure legal phrases, is the legal right to propose to our children that theirs is an acceptable alternate way of life. … I will lead such a crusade to stop it as this country has not seen before.

    All the same “grooming children” lies as Moms for Liberty today. They have no new playbook, and they’ll keep using it under a new name.

    Fortunately, they’ve also been getting less effective with each iteration. Moms for Liberty basically imploded after a few electoral successes.

    • slurpeesoforion@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Who would have thought calm, outlandishly dressed people would be more effective than calmly dressed, outlandishly behaved people?