President Joe Biden announced Thursday $3 billion toward identifying and replacing theĀ nationā€™s unsafeĀ leadĀ pipes,Ā a long-sought move to improve public health and clean drinking waterĀ that will be paidĀ for by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law.

Biden unveiled the new fundingĀ in North Carolina, a battleground state Democrats have lost to Donald Trump in the past two presidential electionsĀ but are feeling more bullish toward due to an abortion measure on the stateā€™s ballot this November.

ā€¦

The Environmental Protection Agency will invest $3 billion in theĀ leadĀ pipe effort annually through 2026, Administrator Michael Regan told reporters. He said that nearly 50% of the funding will go to disadvantaged communities ā€“ and a fact sheet from the Biden administration noted that ā€œlead exposure disproportionately affects communities of color and low-income families.ā€

  • snooggums
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    Ā·
    5 months ago

    You just described using funds to do two things at the same time, which is efficient use of funds.

    • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      Ā·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, but every dollar spent on repaving roads is a dollar that canā€™t be spent on lead pipes.

      I suppose the example Iā€™ve provided is flawed in a sense though. Probably a better example would be that an intersection gets torn up to replace pipes, but the local town council insists on using his brotherā€™s asphalt company. ā€œThey might cost twice as much for the repavong, but I promise, itā€™ll be higher qualityā€ kinda junk.

      • snooggums
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        Ā·
        5 months ago

        Yes, your second example would be corruption because it is being used to intentionally benefit a specific purpose instead of the public.