• archomrade [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    The same can be said of any us based social media company.

    Idk this just feels like red scare propaganda

    • djsoren19@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, except China has been committing a genocide and would gladly commit an atrocity on the scale of Israel x Palestine to Taiwan if the U.S. blinks.

      Yes, the U.S. is evil as hell, and yet China is still worse. The U.S. doesn’t have citizen reeducation camps, people don’t get disappeared for talking out against dear leader. If you can’t understand why giving an adversary like that unfettered access to people’s minds is a security risk, I’ve no interest in arguing geopolitics with you.

      • archomrade [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m not making a comparison between china and the us, I’m simply pointing out that banning chinese control over social media doesn’t address the vulnerability of social media being manipulated against users by other parties.

        If you have a problem with china owning a social media platform because they could potentially scew public perception through manipulative practices, then I would imagine the core of the issue isn’t chinese ownership but the manipulative potential of social media algorithms generally.

        I think most people would much prefer more transparent practices and user choice, such as what federated social media protocols provide. We shouldn’t simply ban the one we fear, we should regulate them all so that users have more choice and control themselves.