• redempt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    it’s not that tiktok is good, it’s that banning it sets a bad precedent and will be used to justify further control and censorship of the internet

    • zovits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m all for setting a precedent if it’s about banning chinese spyware and propaganda weapons.

      • Jako301@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        They don’t want to ban it, they want to seize controll of it and let it operate as is, just with different propaganda now.

    • solarvector@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s a much better argument than what’s presented in this meme. There’s at least an argument to claim that the difference is about curtailing foreign interest through ownership. Ownership does heavily influence a platform. Unfortunately that hasn’t prevented Murdock from owning more formal messaging platforms.

      On a side note, how do you feel about a handful of corporations controlling and censoring the Internet?