• 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    129
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Libraries would need more funding to operate extended hours…

    Then people would complain about gov’t spending and taxes. Then we would privatize the libraries

    This is why we cant have nice things

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Capitalists trying to convince the public to privatize things has nothing to do with cost; even if they were free, every dollar saved by the public represents a potential profit they’re losing.

      • exothermic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Ah yes, privatization will make it cheaper because of competition…

        meanwhile one company buys out all the competition, monopolizes, charges more, and becomes the modern day version of a duke or lord. Yay capitalism

    • poVoq@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Cheaply selling drinks (maybe non-alcoholic) would probably more than off-set the additional costs.

    • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m pro-library, and many reduced hours during the pandemic and never picked it back up. Resources are shrinking for them.

      And it sucks that there’s so many society problems and places like libraries and ER rooms get slashed resources. Because these spaces serve a public good, for neighborhoods, and the unhoused.

      • volvoxvsmarla @lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        these spaces serve a public good, for neighborhoods, and the unhoused.

        This is why I don’t get the generalized hate on taxes. If I worked and had to give like 90% away for taxes and was left just with pocket money I would be absolutely on board if that meant that the money went to what you mentioned above. Guaranteed healthcare, good education for kids, an apartment, basic foods. Imagine having everything you need provided to you and just having 200-300€ a month to spend on what you will. Theater, movies, a fancy restaurant, or save up for a small trip. And all the while you know you’re safe, and your neighbor is safe, and in the fancy third wave coffee shop you sit next to the garbage man and the finance attorney because both have pretty much equal money to spend. But somehow just the idea of having to pay taxes turns so many people off.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      In his book Humankind Rutger Bregman talks about the election of a mayor in a city in Venezuela who campaigned on the notion that he wouldn’t do the job. After years of corruption and broken promises from other politicians, the people hated the mayor so much they liked this idea a lot.

      Part of his job was to create a budget. So he told everybody to submit a budget, and gave them last year’s as a template. The general consensus was that they’d happily raise their taxes to pay for new parks and bus routes.

      (This is a half remembered summary but I highly recommend the entire book.)

      I think the real reason we can’t have nice things is because we don’t have a way to make sure nice things can happen.

        • JimmyChanga@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Presumably not the same one no, but somebody has to cover it. Not a job that’s traditionally shift work in my past of be world, so a sizeable change for existing staff. I think a community ran version would be better for this sort of idea, or if people are aware of the less formal evening setting doesn’t have to be full librarians on staff, reduced service sort of thing.