Donald Trump would be on track to win a historic landslide in November ā€” if so many US voters didnā€™t find him personally repugnant.

Roughly 53 percent of Americans have anĀ unfavorable opinionĀ of the former president. And yet, when asked about Trumpā€™s ability to handle key issues ā€” or the impact of hisĀ policiesĀ ā€”Ā voters routinelyĀ giveĀ the Republican candidate higher marks thanĀ President Biden.

In aĀ YouGov surveyĀ released this month, Trump boasted an advantage over Biden on 10 of the 15 issues polled. On the three issues that votersĀ routinely nameĀ as top priorities ā€” theĀ economy, immigration, and inflation ā€” respondents said that Trump would do a better job by double-digit margins.

Meanwhile, in aĀ recent New York Times/Siena College poll,Ā 40 percent of voters said that Trumpā€™s policies had helped them personally, while just 18 percent said the same of Biden. If Americans could elect a normal human being with Trumpā€™s reputation for being ā€œtoughā€ on immigration and good at economics, they would almost certainly do so.

Biden is fortunate that voters do not have that option. But to erase Trumpā€™sĀ small but stubborn leadĀ in the polls, the president needs to erode his GOP rivalā€™s advantage on the issues.

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    Ā·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    What blows my mind is how many people these poles seem to say think that Donald Trumpā€™s economic policies are so great. The fact is that he, in four short years, undid nearly all of the economic growth that Obama built on for eight full years. And that was before he mishandled the pandemic so unfathomably badly that our country is still recovering from it four years later.

    It is just mind boggling that there are people, that arenā€™t a part of his moronic base, who see him as anything but a buffoon.

    Edit: formatting and clarification.

    • OlPatchy2Eyes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      Ā·
      8 months ago

      The economy is a really easy target for someone to point to to claim a president is doing well or poorly. Really whenever someone makes a claim about ā€œthe economyā€ in general without specifying which metrics theyā€™re talking about and why those are relevant, theyā€™re full of it and just using it to make the list of pros or cons longer.

      Iā€™m still in my 20s and Iā€™m more or less a layman as far as economics go. Ever since I started paying attention to politics, the economy has simultaneously been doing extremely well and poorly depending on who you ask, and they can use a whole mess of different metrics to explain why theyā€™re right. Meanwhile the only thing I really notice is the price of gas, groceries, or rent.

      It seems that we live in two different economies: a good one for people that support the president, and a bad one for those that donā€™t.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        Ā·
        8 months ago

        I think itā€™s a whole lot simpler than that.

        Trumps presidency was 80% pre-covid, and entirely pre-inflation. Bidens was all covid, all inflation that saw the average person lose 20-30% of their pay.

        This is how stupid and simplistic the average voter is, and itā€™s why conservative propaganda works so well. Their feelings donā€™t care about facts.

        • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          Ā·
          8 months ago

          And have pretty much always been that way, at least in semi recent memory, and the GOP have used this fact constantly by taking credit for their Dem predecessorsā€™ economic policies and by the time the negative impact of their policies start to be seen, the Dems are back in power and the GOP blames them for the hardship

          The average voter does not and apparently will never understand that economic policy takes years to fully see and feel the impact

      • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        Ā·
        8 months ago

        Iā€™ve been working for three decades. In that time, weā€™ve had some legitimate financial crises such as 9/11, 2008, and COVID.

        Those aside, what Iā€™ve mainly witnessed is people who fail in business or lose their job via incompetence never say, ā€œMan, I shouldā€™ve hired a legitimate bookkeeper and stopped using my corporate card to cut rails in the strip club bathroom,ā€ or, ā€œMan, maybe I shouldā€™ve shown up to work more than twice a month and maybe I shouldnā€™t have slapped the receptionist on the ass when I did show up.ā€

        No. Itā€™s always, ā€œMy business failed and I lost my job because of the economyā€

        ā€œThe economyā€ is some great catch all bogeyman scapegoat that has very little basis in meaning when used in daily conversation, especially as it pertains to personal finance.

        We can talk about corporatocracies or consolidation of wealth or two tier justice because those things are real and should be addressed, but they are rarely what people are referring to when they blame ā€œthe economy.ā€

    • Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      Ā·
      8 months ago

      The people still supporting Trump, by and large, live in an entirely different reality than the rest of us. Even among Republicans, the belief that Biden actually won the last election or that Trump has done anything wrong is strongly correlated with Fox News viewership.