• MxM111@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Why you did not use an app that can take a photo of a document? Even if you do not want to use free trial, they are still cheaper than $12 per single payment (usually a week of use).

    • Vladkar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Honestly, I’m not familiar enough with the world of faxing to know which apps are trustworthy, especially since the documents contained personal information. If I ever have to send another fax, I’ll consider it.

      • MxM111@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        If it is paid app with lots subscriptions, most likely it is safe (or as safe as government). The biggest problem with those if somebody else steals your login info from their system. I do not believe they hunt or store faxes themselves if you delete the document after sending.

        • renzev@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Just take a photo with a trusted regular camera app and then enhance it with imagemagick. I have this script, works like a charm: convert INPUT_IMAGE.jpg -colorspace gray \( +clone -blur 15,15 \) -compose Divide_Src -composite -normalize -threshold 80% OUTPUT_IMAGE.jpg. Pretty sure you can also specify multiple input images, and imagemagick can merge it into a PDF file. For joining a really large number of images into PDF files (e.g.scans of entire books), you can convert each image individually, and then pdunite them. So something like for i in *; do convert $i $i.pdf; done; pdfunite $(ls *.pdf | sort -n) output.pdf

          Apps are bloat. Reject modernity, embrace shell scripts.

          • meyotch@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            I agree.

            Does it count if one uses an LLM to help compose the shell script? I mean, I can and have written gnarly scripts by hand but it can take half an hour to work out a single line sometimes for a simple task versus 10 minutes describing it in plain language.

            • renzev@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Of course it “counts”! Whatever gets the job done! I personally am pretty bad with writing shell scripts, so I often use LLMs as “pseudocode compilers”. Like, I literally give it an entire program in pseudocode, and most of the time it can “compile” it to BASH or posix shell pretty well. Maybe some people might argue that it’s better to just sit down and learn shell scripting yourself, but I would argue that just by looking at or tweaking LLM-generated scripts you’re already passively learning the basic syntax and conventions. Not to mention that you can ask it to explain parts of the code to you!

              • meyotch@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                Whew, thanks for not being a knee-jerk about my ‘mental prosthetic’! It takes real skill and understanding, I think, to even write the pseudocode or plain language description of a working script. After all, describing the problem and the outline of the solution is usually the hardest part. Pecking out the syntax takes the bulk of the time, but if you can avoid that step, what is lost? Very little in my experience.

                I’ve begun collecting an assortment of custom python and shell script utilities to accomplish routine or one-off tasks for which system utilities don’t exist. You bet you are still learning when doing it this way. After all, you have to understand the code well enough to tell if the output is what you need.

                • renzev@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  After all, describing the problem and the outline of the solution is usually the hardest part.

                  This is what people who think that AI will replace programmers don’t understand. Programming is a way of thinking; knowing all the syntax and best practices is of course important, but secondary. If you’ve got that curiosity burning inside, those skills will come automatically as you gain more experience. Keep on learning, and don’t be afraid to use the latest tools to your advantage, no matter what snobs on the internet say!

    • brian@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      An app isn’t going to fax the document, though, which is where I’d assume the $12 charge is really coming.