• altec
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    I mean, it’s true. Network-connected devices are inherently a cyber security risk.

    • kadu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yes, which is why that can’t be used as an argument against one specific tool.

      • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        The benefits massively outweigh the risks when it comes to open source ad blockers (lets be honest, we’re all talking about uBO), but limiting your attack surface is a very widely practiced concept in cubersecurity, and there’s no situation where it is totally without merit.

        • kadu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Not using a browser extension but loading JavaScript isn’t limiting your attack surface

          • psivchaz@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            To be fair, I bet some percentage of those that don’t use an ad blocker ARE using something like no script and just don’t need one as a result.