I was making people question the original premise that a. No gynecological procedures involve sedation b. That this still occurs universally and contemporaneously and c. That male doctors somehow have exclusive and universal control over procedures and have denied sedation out of deliberate malfeasance.
You then tried to apply a false reading to an unrelated situation to create a false equivalency.
Your comment was as ludicrous as saying, “You don’t like chocolate ice cream? So what you’re saying is that you support the bombing of Palestine!!!”
You absolutely didn’t have to. And my response is absolutely on me.
If your goal was to be ambiguous with your question, you achieved it. If your goal was to outline points a, b and c above, you did not succeed.
I was making people question the original premise that a. No gynecological procedures involve sedation b. That this still occurs universally and contemporaneously and c. That male doctors somehow have exclusive and universal control over procedures and have denied sedation out of deliberate malfeasance.
You then tried to apply a false reading to an unrelated situation to create a false equivalency.
Your comment was as ludicrous as saying, “You don’t like chocolate ice cream? So what you’re saying is that you support the bombing of Palestine!!!”
If perhaps you explained yourself in the original comment, I would not have assumed incorrectly.
Your question doesn’t even fully cover point c, let alone a and b. I’m not psychic 🤷♀️
I didn’t have to, because it was a question. Your ridiculous response is on you, buddy 🤷♂️
You absolutely didn’t have to. And my response is absolutely on me. If your goal was to be ambiguous with your question, you achieved it. If your goal was to outline points a, b and c above, you did not succeed.
You’re trying to impose a goal then claiming that I failed? You’re really telling on yourself here bud