• Signtist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    7 months ago

    I want to tell people this sometimes, but I figure they’ll just think I’m mansplaining mansplaining.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not really. When a dude pulls the “sorry, I’m neurodivergent and can talk way too much about this” or “I’m sorry I struggle with getting my thoughts clear to other people so I can overexplain” I’m a lot more sympathetic. I really think it’s best to think of mansplaining as gendered preemptive assumption of lack of knowledge

    • Sam, The Man@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 months ago

      The key is to never take a clear pause; semicolons only; make them worried if you’re alright with a torrent of Skink facts.

        • Sam, The Man@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          7 months ago

          Did you know: there’s a mathematical formula that uses the length of a skinks toes and the length of its tail to determine how arboreal the species is?

          Also, skinks wanna be your friend!

                • Sam, The Man@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Regretfully I only have two skink facts. If you’d like, I can start making them up? Or replacing real facts with skinks?

                  Did you know the Ancient Egyptians worshiped skinks (crocodiles) for the way they protect their young? And the temple in Skinkodopolis, priests would bejewel these skinks, and mummify them along with pets and servants.

        • atomicorange@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 months ago

          Scientists have not conclusively determined which species of skink is the cutest. But it’s this one.

  • Gaspar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    7 months ago

    You forgot about the part of option 2 where you realize midway through explaining that the other person either understood and you misread the situation, or they just don’t care, but now you’ve gotten too far into the explanation and you just have to power through even though literally every fiber of your being is telling you to shut up

    … wait

    • BallsandBayonets@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      7 months ago

      Also the need to include irrelevant context and to overly correct yourself on irrelevant details.

      “So I learned this from a coworker who drove a blue car, or was it red? Either way it was definitely a 1993 Honda Civic. Or '94. Definitely from the early 90s. I could tell when they got to work because the brakes sounded like a duck that got hit by a rock, not that I’ve ever thrown a rock at a duck! I did chase a goose away from my dog with a stick once. That dog was fearless in every situation except against birds. I never found out what breed he was but probably a shepherd mix. I remember the day my parents brought him home…”

    • blindsight@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah… Explaining things the other person doesn’t care about…

      My wife called me on that earlier today. “I know you need to ADHD info dump on me, but it’s time to wrap it up.”

    • Lev_Astov@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      In my experience, they usually lose interest partway through the clarification and then later ask three questions that were covered while they weren’t paying attention.

  • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    that’s a thing, sure, but at least personally most of the time it’s neither of these, it’s “i have so much knowledge of this topic lodged inside my brain that it’s fighting to escape and i have a profound need to talk about it to others, and there is no greater joy in life than having a person ask follow-up questions”

    • Tobberone@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 months ago

      And it would be so much better if that something was something others actually find interesting. Instead its something esoteric like energy storage solutions, or the difference between b550 and x570. I was once asked, “what’s the difference between m-ATX and mini-ITX?” And I knew way to much about it to be socially healthy…

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 months ago

        This is what I like about the makerspace community. We get a lot of new members who almost reflectively react to the perceived “WTF are they talking about, why won’t they shut up?” vibe that most people give off. It’s an amazing trainwreck when they realise that they are not only not annoying people with it, but that people have an active interest!

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        m-ATX is if you need a computer without excessive IO, mini-ITX is when you have to choose between proper VRM and a second DIMM slot. Oh, and pay double for less than half the real estate.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      you will fucking love sociology and philosophy then.

      the cycle goes something like this:

      • You write a shitty book about philosophy.
      • Someone else reads your shitty book. Decides they have a lot of thoughts on your shitty book, and then write their own shitty book about it.
      • You then read that book, because now reading is the only thing you do in your time ever (on account of the philosophy) and now you have more thoughts on the topic, and so you write another shitty book.

      And this is how we get shit like “incars” philosophy is truly incredible.

    • Microw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      That sounds like you may too few people in your life to talk a lot and deeply to? Or you simply have a way higher urge to talk than the average person

  • Nora@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Option 3: I work in IT. I see on a daily basis people with bachelor’s and PHDs doing some of the stupidest shit. I assume no one knows fuck all.

    Them: “My camera for teams isn’t working please help!”

    Me: Flicks open the webcam cover and smiles trying not to make them feel too bad😅

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 months ago

      Having received a screenshot of an Excel spreadsheet, embedded into a Word document, I always go option 3.

      I’m also old enough to have had to explain why a 27MB Publisher file could not fit on a floppy disk to be sent to the printers.

    • Fungah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is what the case is 9 times out of 10.

      Mansplaining is a thing, sure. lit happens. But I think a key aspect of it is talking down to someone. Its explaining things like how to turn on a computer or telling an engineer how to do addition.

      My head is filled with mostly useless facts. I’ve learned that if im talking to someone about something I’m interested in chances are they’ll have never heard of it or no nothing about it. So I make sure to ask things like: do you know much about x? Or have you heard of you before?

      It gives me an idea of how much I’ll need to explain. Ive had a few instances where someone has gotten indignant to the question. To which I normally reply by jumping right past first principles and into to the heart of it. Cue confused look.

    • TonyOstrich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m right there with you, but I can’t ever seem to thread the needle. Like in your Matrix example I have had people get offended by a question like that.

      More generally speaking, I think it’s so difficult because a lot of people aren’t actually all that interested in learning or communicating in a way where a mutual understanding of each other’s base reality/knowledge are understood. They prefer to operate on their innate or learned social cues and prefer making assumptions or reading between the lines of what the other person is saying. Or in modern parlance, they just go by the vibes.

      I have watched two people completely talk past each other and misunderstand the other person and yet they both seemed to come out of the conversation pleased with the interaction so many times. It’s baffling to me.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      In theory, asking them first makes sense, but when you’re me, and your nerdy interest is in stuff like nuclear reactors and linux. You don’t bother asking because 90% of the time, you either know who you’re talking to, and can assume that they have a similar level of knowledge, or you assume they don’t because you’re pretty certain they don’t and it works well 99% of the time.

  • arf@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    7 months ago

    As the goto “Tech Support person” in my friend group, this really strikes a nerve. I really hope I haven’t come off as a know-it-all. Trying to explain any kind of broad subject feels like playing pinball with all the thoughts in my brain while trying not to let the conversation flow sink into the gutter.

    • ExtraPartsLeft@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think if your friends are coming to you and asking for help, then you’re in the clear. Part of being a know-it-all/mansplaining, is that nobody asked and they decided they needed to bestow that information onto others.

      • JFowler369@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        As an over-explainer I never got the mindset of being mad at more information. Regardless of whether I know something or not I would never get upset that someone shared knowledge with me. The more information the better. If I already knew, what’s the big deal? If I didn’t, great learned something new. If I disagree, I’ll say why and try to understand their point of view and maybe end up with a better understanding based on their knowledge/perspective.

        Genuinely curious why it is so upsetting? Why would we not want to encourage knowledge sharing? Seems like the person thinks you are calling them dumb by telling them things, but how are you supposed to know what other people know? Personally I think it says more about the person getting mad than the person sharing information, but I know I’m in the minority for that.

    • Weirdfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      I get it from my father. He was one of the smartest people I’ve ever known, but if you asked him anything, you better have a lot of free time cause it is going back to first principles.

      I know his reasoning was that he wanted me to learn how to understand and find the answer, not just be given it, and now I’m guilty of the same thing.

      I don’t do it at work, or at least I try not to, as they are paying me for the solution not a dissertation, but if friends or family ask for tech support, they are getting the whole explanation while I solve the problem.

      I guess another part of it is that like me, he really didn’t have anyone to talk tech to other than his family, and really just enjoyed the time being able to share things he was knowledgeable about.

    • RiverGhost@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m an old millennial AuDHD and I have to resist the urge to use bold and italics everywhere for different kinds of emphasis. I’d use even more variations when available (text size, colors).

      When I was younger, I used to do the same in analog form with multi colored pens when taking notes.

      • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        I don’t often bold comments, but i do like using italics and sometimes all caps to EMPHASIZE an important part. I guess the difference for me is whether it’s something I get fired up over like bodily autonomy. I use caps to emphasize more than italics.

        In a regular discussion or if I’m just overexplaining something, I stick to italics. (and if I feel something needs additional clarification, but also maybe the reader wants to skip because it’s not really necessary, I’ll use parenthesis to show where you can skip to)

      • Spot@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Oh! Same. You cannot portray the nuances of speech easily through text. I often feel like my intentions may be misconstrued if I don’t emphasize or elaborate, lol. I still have an array of colored pens for personal and close friend/family use!

    • Damage@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      You can read the bold parts only and still understand the text

  • brrt@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I feel for me it’s more like:

    A problem is presented to me that I haven’t encountered before but I feel like I’m expected to help. So I start talking while my brain works its way through all possible scenarios leading to me rambling on until I maybe possibly arrive at a conclusion which will hopefully make the whole thing make sense in the end.

    Of course later, once the situation has long resolved, my brain will have completed a few other calculations subconsciously and I will know for sure that I was an idiot and you, the person I tried to help, will probably think so too. 😆

  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Oh man this hits hard.

    I’ve been working on a project at work lately and everything I explain to people about it (namely people above my boss), I feel like I have to give like 5 years of backstory first.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      IMO, it’s just being overly confident and stubborn in your explanation of something. specifically in relation to the two sexes (or genders, depending on the scenario)

      Anything else just doesn’t apply. But i also have a pretty strict definition of anything like this tbh.

      • Pulptastic
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Poor communication often by men. Assuming the other is uninformed and then not picking up on cues from them, taking the explanation way too far.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s rather broad i think. Like are we including people who don’t socially communicate very well? Like autistic people for example. I like to define things specifically enough that they have an explicit category. I don’t interact with people physically very often, i’m not good on picking up cues, and often just completely ignore their physical state, because i’m in the middle of doing something else.

          Forgive me if i’m rather brazen here, but like, just fucking tell me i’m being a dumbass and explaining something i don’t need to. It’s fine.

  • BigBenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 months ago

    My dad does the opposite of mansplaining, he explains things using terminology and concepts that are way above my level of understanding and gets frustrated when I ask too many clarifying questions or when I struggle to catch on.

    It fucked with me pretty bad growing up and in an effort not to put other people through that I tend to assume people know little about esoteric subjects I’m talking about and try to explain things in a way the general layperson would understand. If they let on that they seem familiar with the subject then I adjust but I do often worry I’m coming off as being condescending :⁠-⁠\

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      I tend to assume people know little about esoteric subjects I’m talking about and try to explain things in a way the general layperson would understand. If they let on that they seem familiar with the subject then I adjust but I do often worry I’m coming off as being condescending :⁠-⁠\

      I do the same thing. I feel like I suck at explaining things, because I am so deeply into a few things, and shallowly into a ton of things, I have no idea what the average layperson knows. When I’m explaining how I solve a Rubik’s cube, do I use the word algorithm? Do people know what algorithm means?

      How much does the average person know about space travel? I got into KSP at a relatively young age, so I have no idea if most people are aware that to get to orbit you have to go really fast sideways. I have no idea how many people think that astronauts could drop something off of the ISS onto the planet. Can I use the phrase ∆v? How deeply am I going to have to explain the concept of ∆v?

      I think the most complex thing that I can reasonably explain is what a parsec is, but it still takes like 3 paragraphs, and that’s assuming I don’t have to explain the concept of using degrees to measure how far apart things appear to be in your field of vision. Which I genuinely don’t know whether that’s general knowledge or not.

    • Manalith
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I tend to just lean into the fact that I can’t explain things well and get as vague as possible.

      “Hey honey, how was work?”

      “Not bad, did a thing that lead to another thing needing to be done and broke all of the things at the place.”

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      You joke but I had an ex get mad at me for “mansplaining” in her words, because I would overexplain when I’d talk about some semi-niche shit like Settlers of Catan, or when she asked what I was doing and I had to explain what a gas block does. So, I just started assuming she knows everything all the time and would ask when clarification was needed. I wasn’t even being an asshole about it, but she didn’t want to do that either, seems she wanted me to somehow know what she does or doesn’t know and only explain the bits she’s missing. Can’t win em all I guess lol.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    usually when i’m getting into some really nerdy shit, i tend to explain the ever living hell out of it, because shits complicated as fuck.

    I could ask whether the other party knows it, but let’s be real, i’m enjoying myself too much to ask lmao. Just tell me to stop and i will.