A patent application from the company spotted by Lowpass describes a system for displaying ads over any device connected over HDMI, a list that could include cable boxes, game consoles, DVD or Blu-ray players, PCs, or even other video streaming devices. Roku filed for the patent in August 2023 and it was published in November 2023, though it hasn’t yet been granted.

The technology described would detect whether content was paused in multiple ways—if the video being displayed is static, if there’s no audio being played, if a pause symbol is shown anywhere on screen, or if (on a TV with HDMI-CEC enabled) a pause signal has been received from some passthrough remote control. The system would analyze the paused image and use metadata “to identify one or more objects” in the video frame, transmit that identification information to a network, and receive and display a “relevant ad” over top of whatever the paused content is.

  • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Vlc is pretty good, and I run a pretty strange distro. If I’m extra scared, I’ll use qubes or get a sacrifice machine.

    I think the poor having culture is important. Either art is important, or it Fucking isn’t. You seem to be arguing its the frivolity, not the substance and fruit of civilization.

    Video isnt my favorite medium, I have a lot of criticisms of it, but its still art, still precious. And so everyone deserves to have it.

    • Llewellyn@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      And so everyone deserves to have it.

      And authors along with those, who maintain content distributing infrastructure, deserve to be rewarded for their labour.

      • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        But I can’t pay them. Its not generally an option. Have you seen the terms on their Fucking contracts?

        Literally the closest I can get is wandering around Los Angeles giving money to people who look vaguely familiar or give off writerly vibes.

        • Llewellyn@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          But I can’t pay them.

          Then don’t consume the product. It’s entertainment, not vital goods.

          By the way, where do their salaries come from, in your opinion?

          • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Okay but then noone should. Theres no way to give money to the people who made this shit. I’m not saying I’m poor, I’m saying there is no vector by which I could.

            And I just said why I’m gonna, and why I’m gonna give more away to everyone else. I’m gonna buy extra tools to do that, just to spite your classist ‘the poor should have no culture’ bullshit.

            • Llewellyn@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Theres no way to give money to the people who made this shit.

              But there is. Part of the money you pay distributors goes to the creators.

              And by the way: distributors not just “speculate on digital goods” or whatever you seem to imply. They distribute. That means they make goods available through the internet in a convenient way.

              Servers won’t pay for themselves.

              • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Wait were you calling amazon video Hulu and Netflix convenient? Are you an ad fetishist? Is the best part of a movie figuring out where and how to watch it? I can’t understand another way to believe this.

                • Llewellyn@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  More convenient for me, than torrents: because I watch content either on TV or on phone.

                  • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    I have vlc on my phone. Toss an sdcard in yhere, movies for days (more if i rewatch or dont watch while sleeping).

                    Dunno about TVs but last time I saw someone use one’s native software it looked like hell to use.

              • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                part of the money you pay to the owners

                Lol no it doesn’t. I saw the contracts the AFL-CIA pushed on the workers, and I know being good bought or beloved doesn’t get people hired again because the shit heads who do get the money send it on cocaine and child slaves and private jets and the worst possible decisions with the capital and IP dipshits like you give them.

                I don’t get my films from Netflix. I torrent them; distribution is a community effort!

                Don’t worry; I give back, keep my seed ratio high, never shut off a torrent until its at least 3:1 etc.