I’m curious how software can be created and evolve over time. I’m afraid that at some point, we’ll realize there are issues with the software we’re using that can only be remedied by massive changes or a complete rewrite.

Are there any instances of this happening? Where something is designed with a flaw that doesn’t get realized until much later, necessitating scrapping the whole thing and starting from scratch?

  • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Happens all the time on Linux. The current instance would be the shift from X11 to Wayland.

    The first thing I noticed was when the audio system switched from OSS to ALSA.

    • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      71
      ·
      7 months ago

      And then ALSA to all those barely functional audio daemons to PulseAudio, and then again to PipeWire. That sure one took a few tries to figure out right.

      • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        And the strangest thing about that is that neither PulseAudio nor Pipewire are replacing anything. ALSA and PulseAudio are still there while I handle my audio through Pipewire.

        • angel@iusearchlinux.fyi
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          How is PulseAudio still there? I mean, sure the protocol is still there, but it’s handled by pipewire-pulse on most systems nowadays (KDE specifically requires PipeWire).

          Also, PulseAudio was never designed to replace ALSA, it’s sitting on top of ALSA to abstract some complexity from the programs, that would arise if they were to use ALSA directly.