cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/15271710
Not a good result. The good amendment to add a warrant requirement failed on a tie vote; bad amendments to expand the scope of warrantless wiretapping passed. Next step: a Senate vote.
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/15271710
Not a good result. The good amendment to add a warrant requirement failed on a tie vote; bad amendments to expand the scope of warrantless wiretapping passed. Next step: a Senate vote.
They got that information before section 702 was a thing. You’re supporting GWB’s wiretapping policy.
Removed by mod
The memo gwb ignored before 9/11 was before section 702 existed. 702 didn’t go into effect until 2008.
If you don’t want me to downvote you, don’t lie in support of a gwb policy.
Removed by mod
I understand that whenever a centrist is dead wrong about something, they pull this gaslighting horseshit.
Removed by mod
You pretended that a policy that didn’t exist before 2008 provided the intel Bush ignored before 9/11.
You don’t understand how linear time works, and have presented no facts.
Removed by mod
You pretended that section 702 got us the intel Bush ignored prior to 9/11. It couldn’t have, as it was implemented almost a decade later.
You lied.