jeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 7 months agoConservative SCOTUS Justices: Why isn't DOJ treating Dobbs protesters like January 6 attackers?www.motherjones.comexternal-linkmessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1216arrow-down113
arrow-up1203arrow-down1external-linkConservative SCOTUS Justices: Why isn't DOJ treating Dobbs protesters like January 6 attackers?www.motherjones.comjeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 7 months agomessage-square52fedilink
minus-squareEnsign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 months ago Where do you gather that the court is sympathetic to the argument? You’ve admitted they’re illegitimate already. They’re sympathetic to any argument as long as its application yields results Republicans want. The justices are literally questioning the other components of the same law which clearly involves more than documents. Because they want to limit the scope of the law to documents only. Why would they question the part of the law they want to keep?
minus-squareEnsign_Crab@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·7 months agoThis thread is now 4 days old, and the comment to which you responded is two days old. You are trying to waste my time, and I’m not going to participate in this discussion any longer.
You’ve admitted they’re illegitimate already. They’re sympathetic to any argument as long as its application yields results Republicans want.
Because they want to limit the scope of the law to documents only. Why would they question the part of the law they want to keep?
Removed by mod
This thread is now 4 days old, and the comment to which you responded is two days old.
You are trying to waste my time, and I’m not going to participate in this discussion any longer.