• zifnab25 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    5 months ago

    I pop in to the Chapo discord and there’s always at least one guy who is die-hard “Aktuly the F-35 is a really good program and the naysayers are just in the bag for the F-22, so you shouldn’t listen to them.”

    Incidentally, I’ve also heard all the critics of Boeing are being paid by Airbus.

      • zifnab25 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        5 months ago

        There’s inevitably a centrist take that amounts to “There’s a secret shadowy organization behind the news article telling you the F-35 is bad, and its intentions are even worse!

        But the end result is a pedantic argument over some functionally unknowable question of which overpriced, badly engineered Pentagon vanity project is the biggest waste of money. Less MIC leg-humping and more “Um, aktuly, you’ve fallen for Pentagon 11D chess!” contrarianness.

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m in the bag for the damn F-16. It should have never been abandoned, they should have just built hundreds and hundreds of the things with robot brains.

      • zifnab25 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Okay but 16 is less than half of 35

        More seriously, they do have F-16s with robot brains. They’re called Predators and they’re terrifying, particularly when employed inside a defensive perimeter.

        But they’re not great at power projection. F-22s/35s are built for extended range.