• BakerBagel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      6 months ago

      Which was the entire point of the line. Belgium back out if their defense deal with France, and even German high command was pissed about how quickly Rommel was going through Northern France. Fall Gelb was absolutely balls to the wall insane and could have seen the German Panzers encircled if the Allied forces had been the least bit competent.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        6 months ago

        if the Allied forces had been the least bit competent

        This is honestly the first time that I’ve ever heard someone say that the Allied forces were incompetent. They did win the war after all.

        • BakerBagel
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          36
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Eventually, but it took a lot of trial and error to get that far. Very few Allied commanders who started the war managed to finish it.

          • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            6 months ago

            100%. The British army, at the time, was good for little more than putting down colonial rebellions against vastly inferiors foes.

            Tbf to them though, at the time, no one had any reason to expect hundreds of mobile artillery fortresses, driven by methed out nazis, to appear 50 miles behind them.

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I guess you could say the Allied forces won the war because their command structure was better at replacement than the Axis

            • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              It was more about resources. The allies were basically the rest of the world between the British, French, and Dutch empires. Japan did more to disrupt that than Germany did, and Germany was eventually knocked out of the Naval war, which left Britain free to import as much as they needed from those combined empires. And the Nazis were running out of fuel, which is why they invaded USSR.

              WWII ended up being a war of attrition just like WWI was, the main difference was that Germany was able to take a lot more territory before their lack of resources caught up with them.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          The Nazis were winning for most of the war. The UK might have been knocked out of the war entirely if the Nazis hadn’t paused their advance and given them a chance to get their men back across the channel, which they needed to borrow civilian boats to do.

  • Dreizehn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    Completely useless and the fucking Muscovites will use human waves to breach the line. The best solution, a shit ton of tungsten pellets, cluster munitions, willy pete and my favorite…napalm. Bring back fucking napalm!

  • Howdy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Now imagine me in the Eastern Line

    Sitting on a mine in the Eastern Line

    Now it’s turned out nice again

    The Army life is fine

    Putin can’t kid us a lot

    His secret weapon’s genocide

    But you ought to see what the polish got

    Down on the Eastern Line

    Down on the Eastern Line

    • EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Not pointless, a somewhat protected border is better than a not protected border if they have to go around it

      That was the entire point of the Maginot line

      • Aqarius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        There’s a philosophical question: if it did it’s job flawlessly, and still accomplished nothing, is it pointless?

        • EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          It accomplished slowing the Germans down and forcing them with going thought the rougher terrain of Belgium. That’s far from nothing

          • Aqarius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            As I said, it worked flawlessly, but if it worked flawlessly, but France still got overrun, it’skinda debatable what the point was?

            • EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              6 months ago

              What’s the point of seatbelts if people wearing them might still die in car crashes? Might as well get rid of them then

  • Lotarion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Except that the only way for these fucks to go around the Eastern Shield is to go through Ukraine, and that’s not exactly possible for these idiots