• RandomStickman@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    6 months ago

    making the feature rely less heavily on user-generated content from sites like Reddit

    Imagine selling out reddit/buying access to the comments for AI just to immediately unprioritise it

    • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      6 months ago

      No one could have seen this coming. Obviously LLMs absolutely completely understand the difference between people joking around with each other and authentic advice.

      Sarcasm aside, Reddit does have some good information about niche topics. There’s just currently no way for AI to understand the difference between dry humor and serious responses. I think the AI summaries are unhelpful anyway, but even if I didn’t it’s pretty obvious Google didn’t think further than “Shove AI into it like a drunken prom night encounter”.

      • sudo42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        There’s just currently no way for AI to understand the difference between dry humor and serious responses.

        There’s no way for humans to do this either. We invented an entirely new series of markers (emoticons, /s, etc.) at a vain attempt at doing just this and still fail.

  • errer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Reid characterized the mistakes that won attention as the result of an internet-wide audit that wasn’t always well intended.

    Oh yeah, there was a conspiracy to embarrass Google with off-the-wall questions like “how do I thicken pizza sauce?”

    Why are these corporate schmucks unable to take any blame?

    • BakerBagel
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      6 months ago

      No audit is well intended. The whole ppint of an audit is to find duplicitous and fucked up shit.

    • OpenStars@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Sadly, b/c their jobs literally depend on them NOT doing so, in today’s corporate hellscape environ:-(.

    • nix
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      If Chromebooks are anything to go by, if google had their way you’d only be allowed to search prescreened questions they think are best for you. Can’t have you experiencing anything not advertiser friendly.

  • gila@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    https://archive.is/96Woj

    The company made “more than a dozen technical improvements” to AI Overviews …

    … making the feature rely less heavily on user-generated content from sites like Reddit

    So it prefers the results that Google normally deprioritizes? I guess we have that in common

    • OpenStars@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 months ago

      I almost wonder what Huffman is thinking right now - he could have been so very close to becoming a billionaire, managing the repository of human general technical knowledge explained simply, but he blew it by being a greedy piggy…

      Not that he will ever admit that, even to himself.

        • OpenStars@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          6 months ago

          His decision tree is like: I say yes, content creators say no, admin rights say yes tho, market ends up saying no tho, the end.

          It seems like I’ve heard this story before somewhere lately…

          img

  • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    6 months ago

    What? Oh no, I had not written down the recipe for using gasoline to cook my spaghetti! Whatever shall I do?

    • OpenStars@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      6 months ago

      Step 1: add gasoline.

      Step 2: add more gasoline.

      Step 3: don’t think about the bridge…

      Step 4: what spaghetti?

        • OpenStars@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          I hope it lasts longer than modern AI tools themselves at this point. They have great potential, but… they cannot replace the (lack of) brains of a manager to be a magic bullet to cure all ill effects of greed, with as little effort put into deploying them as has been done so far.

          not like this

          (From the OG Matrix movie)

          • reev@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            They’re also developing computer chips running on actual biological human brains if that helps the brain aspect

            • OpenStars@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              6 months ago

              Ironically, we keep being told (iirc?) that middle-management was going to be one of the first things to go with the advent of AI. Software was going to eliminate the need for it, allowing one person to manage many tens to hundreds (to thousands?) of people directly.

              Instead, most companies - like big tech, and Boeing, etc. - seem to be going the opposite direction, ditching their actual workers who produce things while keeping the managers?

              This does not seem to be going all that well for Google lately…

  • DrElementary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    The AI bullcrap at the top, before actual search results, is what finally made me change my default engine to duckduckgo

    • Lazycog@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Same, I have tried DDG every once in a while but kept going back to google. Now google search doesn’t quite give me relevant results anymore and all the AI crap just takes all of their effort to work on search itself.

      Been using DDG for a few weeks now for personal and work related stuff - quite happy with it.

    • flauschke@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ve fully committed to kagi now and don’t regret it. The results are actually helpful again and even their AI features are better. The search summary does not seem to hallucinate at all

    • Arfman@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I don’t know about you but the sponsored results and all that search optimisation manipulation made me switch to DDG long before AI

    • Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      My only gripe with duck fuck go is I don’t allow access to my location and can never google (hehe) shit in my town without adding extra words for directions etc

      • B0rax@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        You don’t allow location and are surprised that it does not know you location? Am I missing something here? Why is that surprising?

      • JeffreyOrange@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah what annoys me aswell is that I don’t like to type anything into the search field so noone can steal my data, buttfuck go refuses to give me results that way

        • silasmariner@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          What annoys me about cumslut go is that I like to put in fake searches to throw my FBI agent off the scent and it returns me random shit I don’t really want

    • Footnote2669@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Human review is NEVER going to happen. The amount of comments from Reddit and user queries is mind boggling

      • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        No I meant that the AI makes replies to most popular (or predicted to be popular) questions but a human has to review and accept it manually to push it to the search results. But that still won’t fix everything. It’s just AI that needs to die. That’s it

        • BakerBagel
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Maybe it is a firedox issue, but i have serious issues with location based searchs on DDG. Like, results in the next state over sort of bad.

          • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            That may be a feature of DDG. In respecting privacy, it may be ignoring your location. Since I never let sites have access to location data if I can prevent it, I don’t know.

            • BakerBagel
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              I know, but it’s frustrating when i search “restaurants in Cityville” and the results show restaurants in Cityville Indiana instead of my homestate. Or i search for “T-Mobile stores near me” and they list off ones 3 counties over instead of the ones near me. I understand that it is a privacy thing, but it is very annoying.

              Same thing happens when i look up items on the grocery store website to see if they have something i need. Firefox seems to think i live over an hour away in Dearborn Michigan, so i have to adjust my location manually every time. I understand why it happens and i can accept it , but that doesn’t mean it isn’t frustrating.

              • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 months ago

                Firefox will let you whitelist sites that are allowed to your location. Just whitelist those sites. Or use a search engine that doesn’t respect privacy, say Google or StartPage.

              • bricklove
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                I’m pretty sure I live in a city between you and Dearborn but I don’t want to say the names and dox us. I just thought it was fun to piece together with the few clues and my familiarity with the area

      • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m sure they are. But they haven’t yet. And after this, they might at least borrow a page from Apple and make sure it works first.

        • huginn@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          I mean… They have though. It’s not in bing.com but “Microsoft copilot” is their newly rebranded Bing + AI search engine, which they’re embedding directly into desktops. They’ve been doing the AI summaries longer than Google has afaik.

          • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I haven’t noticed it appearing unasked in internet search results, and I never use the desktop search except for on-device queries.

          • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Nobody’s perfect.

            I don’t know of any MMS problem, but I also don’t generally text outside of iMessages. Maps was a cockup, and Apple owned it.

            • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Owned it by forcing everyone to manually install google maps, which they were already using happily? Or owned it by giving a pr spin after the fact? Group messaging via mms still doesn’t work correctly due to iMessage.

              • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Owned up to the mistake, then suggested alternatives while they were finishing Maps, which had been rushed due to the launch of Android and Jobs not wanting a competitor’s CEO sitting on Apple’s board.

                I have no idea what you’re on about messaging. I can use it just fine.

  • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Everyone remember to pollute your answers wherever you post them at least once a day.

    • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      The best way to avoid having your words used by an LLM is to mash your fingers with a mallet before typing. The resulting typographical errors will ensure that the AI rejects your text before using it for training.

  • makeasnek@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    We need decentralized, federated search. I remember YaCy from years ago was attempting this. Anybody know if there’s anybody actively working on this?

        • AJ Sadauskas@aus.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          @makeasnek On a broader note, I think possibly the best approach for decentralised, open-sourced web search might be an evolution on the SearXNG model.

          At the top of the funnel, you have meta search engines that query and aggregate results from a number of smaller niche search engines.

          The metasearch engines are open source, anyone with a spare server or a web hosting account can spin one up.

          For some larger sites that are trustworthy, such as Wikipedia, the site’s own search engine might be what’s queried.

          For the Fediverse and other similar federated networks, the query is fed through a trusted node on the network.

          And then there’s a host of smaller niche search engines, which only crawl and index pages on a small number of websites vetted and curated by a human.

          (Perhaps on a particular topic? Or a local library or university might curate a list of notable local websites?)

          (Alternatively, it might be that a crawler for a web index like Curlie.org only crawls websites chosen by its topic moderators.)

          In this manner, you could build a decent web search engine without needing the scale of Google or Microsoft.

  • Yerbouti@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Am I the only one who doesn’t have access to this? I’m in canada but using a VPN doesn’t seem to change anything. Not that I care about AI, but I’d like to see the shitshow myself.

  • Auzy@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I looked something up today.

    Do plumbers fit shower screens? Plumbers do not usually fit frameless shower screens. Most of the time, they break the glass panels and hurt themselves. Others do not try going through the installation hassle.

    The whole thing is embarrassing. The only way it could be worse could be if they harvested 4chan

  • BitsOfBeard@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Thanks to screw-ups like these, I was on the hunt for a better search engine. I may have found one in kagi.com. Anyone else willing to pay to get rid of tracking, check it out!